More energy in the US comes from renewables than Nuclear. It's gone from 1.1% in 2007 to 11% in 2019. Meanwhile nuclear has stagnated. The construction times for nuclear are just too high.

Renewables have seen much better progress in that time. Fusion is a pipe dream.

Why are we betting on Fusion to save us from climate disaster when we have the technology to build renewables now? It didn't even produce a useful amount of electricity. It used 3MJ and output 2.5MJ.

I don't know what you people are so upset about, it's being reported in major news channels like everything else. It's just not a particularly controversial case.

It's in AP News, hardly swept under the rug. I don't know what you want the media to do. It's not a controversial case like Rittenhouse's was.

I asked why you thought the cases were similar. You told me that they both involve violence and happened in Wisconsin. You then proceeded to claim that there's a conspiracy to obfuscate his motives for his crime. I don't really know what you're upset about. What do you want the media to do?

"They're both in Wisconsin and involve violence" can describe hundreds of events that take place every week. The comparisons people make between Brooks and Rittenhouse are so tenuous I can't help but feel like they're being disingenuous. I don't know what you want people to tell you about his motives. He's insane and ran people over because he likes to hurt people.

It's been in the news quite a bit.

what do the two cases have anything to do with each other?