AI would be a poor tool to use for diagnostics when you think about it. You'd be better served by something that find Runs through a list and has reliable output. It can be done, but I'm just not sure why it would be the choice. Online shopping is definitely in the AI wheelhouse.

Artists and authors who work often aren't as worried because they know they can beat it.

>Well, the determination of the limits on AI is their hardware, as what we build can host more complex minds.

This is not true at all.

>Right now humans are better, over time they will reach where we are and moving forward their hardware will keep advancing, and likely merge with humans to be the best we can design. A hybrid of organic and electrical knowledge that is unimaginable today.

Drugs are bad.

>However I would say during 2027-2028 likely AI will achieve competency in the same tasks any 25 year old adult has on a commercial level, but we will have to see.

Source for this?

The technology underpinning AI as we call it today was invented in 1948. It was improved in the 50s and 60s but was abandoned basically because it sucked. We developed better hardware and picked it back up in the 90s. Massive improvements since then. Only since we've seen some open AI toys has this subreddit cared. All that's really going to happen for us as developers is our environments will have better code completion.

I'm sometimes worried how this sub is going to respond twenty years from now when they find out about the Vietnam war.

It's true. The steam engine will put a lot of people out of work.

AI is replacing work right now. Jobs seem to not be going anywhere.

That's a little weird as I remember seeing them and asking about them when I was little. Just lucky I guess?

Must be regional. I see them a lot. The only time I don't is at certain bars, or coffee shops.

Men's rooms don't have changing stations? Now that I think about it I've never seen this when I've traveled to Europe.

I don't know about medicine. Just ML and some of the software they use in research. They are asking in the next twenty years. This gives current technology that beats doctors approximately seven to fifteen year window in the United States for approval in treatment. But some of that may never make it.

Edit: thirty years. I apparently forgot how to read.

Might want to look at that again. I'm saying they're pretty much all future proof.

I don't know why you're asking this sub. You should probably go look at the subreddits more qualified. That said, people are going to be dying over the next 100 years for almost every reason. You'll have work basically no matter what you do. The main thing that's going to happen is your tools are going to improve. Find an area of medicine you think is interesting and go for it. If that's difficult, then go for research.

Liquidation is a valid business decision.

I think that part kinda depends. But I agree with the principle. Sorta why the court system exists to evaluate on a case by case basis. While they're serving their sentence, they will basically be paying 100% tax on profits. Perhaps the government can choose to collect fines in voting shares.

Edit: what I'm worried about is the government reading the 13th amendment.

That way if they appeal they're still held by the government until they win.

They'll just replace them. Government should seize the company on judgement for x years. Like jail, but for corporations.

For the second one, nurses often have a dark sense of humor. It develops when your job includes watching people die.

You think they'll suddenly grow foresight? I was fucking with you but now I'm kinda worried you think there's direction to any of this.

I'm not sure where you are at but .308 cost about a dollar each here. Flour is about eight dollars for twenty five pounds. Assuming 200% accuracy and soldiers who fight for free with zero causalities, it would still have been cheaper to not fire those rounds and feed 37 people for the day. But if you do fire those rounds, you can make more by shooting other things as human flesh might not net you as much in the food market.

It'll be more expensive to fight everyone by a long stretch. It's literally cheaper to do nothing. Also, you can get about 25lb of flour for less than ten .308 rounds.

The technology for each is mostly the same, or at least with high overlap. Maybe we can do two things at once. Not saying we focus equal amounts, but it would be nice to run experiments on not earth if we're worried.

Oh no, using only 20% of the gas you'd use otherwise! Literally the worst!

Then they'll get a low resolution model of Deez Nutz. People aren't giving the best prompts if you've not noticed. It's easier to just get people to use Facebook or Twitter, then look at their purchasing patterns.

How much is Australia adding this year? They will need to grow approximately fifteen percent by year end to keep pace.

If this guy could read he'd be very upset!