He didn’t write the book, and he now has plenty of money. She is still a victim of a particularly brutal crime, and she told her story. Not his.

No, not nothing. She was told they had scientific proof it was him. That along with the emotional coercion and the fallibility of memory (especially after both physical and mental trauma) added up to her agreeing to testify. Let’s not act like this man is the only fucking victim here ok?

The people who should be sued are the junk scientists responsible for “identifying” him.

Why wouldn’t she blame the faulty legal system more than herself? Seriously, the victim blaming overtones here are disgusting. She was told they had scientific proof it was him - that’s not her fault.

And it’s a horrifying story from both of their perspectives there McNasty. Not just his. First she was brutally raped and then she was deceived into helping convict an innocent man. How is it not also horrifying for her?

Lots of things are genetic and still considered diseases. Your point is vacuous and stupid.

These are done for recently deceased people, specifically those whose remains are skeletal or other wise decayed beyond identification.

The reproductions are accurate enough to assist in the identification of murder victims. It’s not like this is new information, either