Rashaverik
Submitted by Rashaverik t3_1273j4a in ColumbiaMD
Rashaverik t1_jeaevcg wrote
Reply to comment by goliebs in The CA Board Confirmed its Own Lack of Transparency at the Most Recent Meeting by goliebs
There were a couple of instances where Bill Santos tried to correct Eric Greenberg multiple times about dates of meetings not being noted in the minutes. Maybe they finally realized that Bill was right?
Rashaverik t1_je38le9 wrote
Reply to Rouse project 2.0 indeed. by hiruy2000
Why do you care Hiruy? You don't even live in Columbia. Does Jake even live in Columbia?
Jake was at my door about a week ago and we talked. He was going around backing a group and issue which he wasn't even informed on.
There's no big "Rouse Project 2.0" conspiracy. It's people who actually care about their community and are tired of the BoD members in power which ARE ACTUALLY costing us hundreds of thousands of dollars. None of which Jake mentioned in his article.
Rashaverik t1_jc4kagw wrote
Reply to Dentist recommendations in the area? by bobnutz3333
I would say to try staying away from any of the dental offices that are tied to Heartland Dental. This happened about 10 years ago. I don't quite understand the relationship, on whether they actually bought up private practices or simply are involved in the administrative end of the business. I know of three different practices in the area that went through big personnel changes when Heartland took over.
A common experience with any of those offices seems to be that you need all kinds of dental work. Some people have mentioned that here. You just need to do your homework and see if they're tied to Heartland.
Personally, I was with one of the those dental offices which went through a change after Heartland was involved. I went in for routine, the dentist which I expected to see wasn't there. They had a 'fill-in' for them and the 'fill-in' tried to get me to agree to an emergency root canal.
Told them I would get back to them and never went back.
Talked with Katkow Dentistry, they recommended I see an endodontist. No issues were found and definitely no need for a root canal.
Dr. Katkow (senior, now retired) did a little fix on one of my fillings which he believed might be the cause for the sensitivity and I've never had another problem since. That was 6 years ago.
​
Be careful when shopping around for a dentist.
EDIT: changed my initial info about Heartland.
Rashaverik t1_jc4hwxj wrote
Reply to comment by jmwchampion in Dentist recommendations in the area? by bobnutz3333
Katkow Dentistry is great. They don't take Delta Dental which is one of the larger dental insurances. They will however submit the claim on your behalf.
For everything routine (cleanings & xrays) I've nearly received everything but maybe 10 dollars back from the insurance claims. Again, they're one of those places that will not rip you off and will not perform a dental procedure unless completely necessary.
IMO, it's worth the 10 dollars. Haven't had to have filling work done luckily, so I can't say what a claim will payback in that case.
I can also understand that you might not always have the money to pay a bill up front. So it does mean paying and getting reimbursed by your insurance company.
Rashaverik t1_jb6wg1f wrote
Reply to Affordable car repairs by pkz100
Eakle's Auto Repair. Family Business. Excellent Service. Very reasonably priced, but a bit farther out off of 40 & Bethany Lane.
Rashaverik t1_ja8j5rt wrote
Reply to comment by bigjd7 in CA Budget approved; board continues to ignore underlying issues impacting the community by goliebs
Not a problem. It's my community too.
Rashaverik t1_ja85sy7 wrote
Reply to comment by bigjd7 in CA Budget approved; board continues to ignore underlying issues impacting the community by goliebs
I actually found the sign on Google Maps.
If you follow 29N, right before Exit 20, you can see the sign from the June 2019 images, but as you progress on the off-ramp, you can see in the Sept. 2022 image the sign is on the ground.
I called the MDOT SHA number I mentioned below, was transferred to the division that handles Howard County. The person I spoke with was very pleasant and I mentioned the downed sign. They'll look into getting the issue addressed.
Lets see how long before it's back up. It's hard to say if it's a redundant sign, as a few hundred feet down the ramp there's another sign, but the downed one included the blue informational signs that the other doesn't have.
Rashaverik t1_ja825vy wrote
Reply to comment by bigjd7 in CA Budget approved; board continues to ignore underlying issues impacting the community by goliebs
Many of those areas that are being mowed are handled not by contractors. They've got plenty of work on their hands and perhaps even mentioned it to a supervisor, but who knows if it was ever reported to the State.
My best recommendation, as you're familiar with the downed sign and it's location, is to contact the MDOT SHA 301-513-7300. I've called them in the past regarding other matters and they're generally responsive to issues.
Rashaverik t1_ja7fid1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in CA Budget approved; board continues to ignore underlying issues impacting the community by goliebs
Remember, MD-175 is a State road. Even if you mentioned it on Tell HoCo, it's possible HoCo personnel may have missed it due to being State property. I've seen them forward the requests to the State in that case. Maybe try again.
I'm also not sure where 'Exit 20' would be. To the best of my knowledge there's no exit numbers on any of the exits off 175. They're all by intersecting street names.
Rashaverik t1_ja1kxg0 wrote
Reply to comment by goliebs in CA funding of Inner Arbor Trust by Sufficient-Item-2750
I'm quoting you here.
"I think our community would be improved with more people talking personally with one another instead of online."
I tried that once with Josh Friedman. At the time I was an employee of the Village of LR. It ended with Nina and Josh sending the same attorneys the IAT and CA Board have used, to talk with me.
I had written a long response to your comment above, but thought it was best left offline. I'd be more than happy to talk with you over a cup of coffee.
Rashaverik t1_ja0icao wrote
Reply to CA funding of Inner Arbor Trust by Sufficient-Item-2750
I'm in complete agreement. I'm not sure what it's going to take, but I eventually expect there will need to be some form of legal action against the CA Board for their actions. At the first mention of HB1024 you can see just who is against it because they fear loosing power that some of them have held for over a decade or longer. We need big changes in CA elections and specifically the CA Board.
Rashaverik t1_j972n5m wrote
Pro Wash Auto Spa. They're on Red Branch Road as well. Have had a good experience with them over the years. Always leave my car looking like new and their ceramic coating is top notch.
Rashaverik t1_j8egt38 wrote
Reply to comment by kevinxb in Alright, which one of you did this to my neighbor by maavaa
Trail Cameras.
I bought one some years ago for a similar issue. They're way more advanced now with wifi and bluetooth, but you don't need all that tech. They're easy to hide in a tree, just make sure it's on your property or someone you have permission from.
Rashaverik t1_j8e72h7 wrote
Here's your solution.
Rashaverik t1_j8e6pp1 wrote
Reply to comment by kevinxb in Alright, which one of you did this to my neighbor by maavaa
'Islands' are County property. Let them know who it is anonymously on Tell HoCo.
Rashaverik t1_j88qhnn wrote
Reply to comment by Classic-Apricot-8236 in Former CA Rep has a scathing resignation letter from the board by goliebs
Yep. I was one of two residents to show to the meeting. Called out their conflicts of interest in the decision making process. Crickets. Nina knew it was a conflict of interest. So Ed motioned for the appointment of Friedman, and the only other LR Board member present (other than Friedman, which was also appointed by the LR Board) seconded the appointment.
Ed Coleman even mentioned to Friedman he could vote for himself.
A little interesting tidbit.
The same outside counsel that CA board has been using is the same counsel the IAT has used. It's also is the same counsel that's been used by the LR Village when when a former employee made claims of serious misconduct by the Village adminitrators and they were concerned with being sued.
Rashaverik t1_j7u8k4b wrote
Reply to Dunkin cups by theballenlife
They announced they were switching back in 2018. I think the transition took a bit longer due to COVID, but it was a company decision. Nothing to do with the County plastic bag ban or supply chain issue.
Rashaverik t1_j6hrfz9 wrote
Reply to comment by YoureUsingCoconuts in New CA BoD Member Statement Regarding Lakey Boyd by goliebs
Good to hear. I hope the 'ca-board.org' domain is handled this way as well.
On the CA website all the Board members have CA-board.org email addresses. A few of the Villages have their CA Rep listed with personal email addresses, not their CA-board.org addresses.
How have some of these people been in office nearly a year (some have served longer terms) and don't conduct business using their CA account. Clearly they've been using personal email to conduct CA business. That'd get you fired from most any job.
Rashaverik t1_j6gwm1s wrote
Reply to comment by ArunawayNERD in New CA BoD Member Statement Regarding Lakey Boyd by goliebs
Interestingly enough. Eric Greenberg went on about not having a CA email, yet the Village of Riverhill has listed him with a CA email addresses, since he was elected.
If CA is handing out address that are simply mail forwarders to the Board Member's personal email account, then that needs to change ASAP.
Rashaverik t1_j63jml7 wrote
Reply to After Lakey Boyd's resignation, Columbia Association starts CEO search process by User_McAwesomeuser
We need to vote everyone but Bill & Andy out.
Rashaverik t1_j53b9oe wrote
Reply to comment by jules9687 in Question about fences in Columbia by kris10185
There was an issue with a past Covenant Advisor, probably the person who did the inspection for the original Letter you received when you purchased the house.
My own home was issued a Letter of Compliance back around 2010, and there were at least a dozen violations until we renovated much of the exterior. A LoC should have never been issued.
What it comes down to, the Covenant Advisors after the problem person, who handled the issuance of the LoCs were directed to correct past mistakes. Rather than admitting what had happened with the past Covenant Advisor. It was real easy to put the blame on the residents considering very few of them had images to back up their claims.
Rashaverik t1_j533lhb wrote
Reply to comment by jules9687 in Question about fences in Columbia by kris10185
Out of curiosity, when did you sell your home?
Rashaverik t1_j52goew wrote
Reply to comment by kris10185 in Question about fences in Columbia by kris10185
Like I said. 48" is the standard height allowed in all the villages that I'm aware of. A 6' fence rarely exists. If it does, it's possibly long grandfathered in due to other circumstances. If you're buying a home that is CA assessed, DO NOT expect to be able to get a 6' fence.
Rashaverik OP t1_jeeff5z wrote
Reply to Loose Tea by Rashaverik
Thanks for all the suggestions everyone. Someone let me know that there's two small shops in Frederick that have a variety of teas. I know it's not 'in the area', but we regularly head that way, so I'll be checking them out.
Viola! is one, the other is Shab Row Tea Emporium. Both small businesses.