Remote_Engine
Remote_Engine t1_je2dzoe wrote
Reply to comment by jlusedude in Garmin’s Forerunner 955 review: Still king for runners and cyclists by SAT0725
I gotta get on your level! Daaaamn, that’s a sweet ecosystem of tools!
Remote_Engine t1_jdzn8et wrote
Reply to comment by dburst_ in Garmin’s Forerunner 955 review: Still king for runners and cyclists by SAT0725
For me, when the Forerunner could display a text from my iPhone, it was over. That piece of convenience is what I liked about the Apple Watch, but nothing else. I’ve been on the feature rich, rugged, long life Forerunners since 2018, and I can’t consider looking back. Apple worked too hard to compartmentalize features into different apps (many that are pay-for to do it well) for a fragile watch that I broke twice. After all, I’m very active and the Apple Watch simply isn’t durable enough, the features are fragmented across apps, and the cost is not inline with competitors.
Remote_Engine t1_jdws11d wrote
Reply to comment by Terrible-Sand-3203 in Garmin’s Forerunner 955 review: Still king for runners and cyclists by SAT0725
Counterpoint: It is exceptional, this is nitpicking of sorts? Users don’t pay for it, and the long term data trends over time are outstanding. It’s not a coach or professional training software, and once that is internalized, I think you’ll better understand that what’s being voiced here is the assumption that it should be. It can be inconsistent in some of the conclusions it draws, but it’s exceptional for free software (and the complaints are irrelevant if you’re already drafting your own training plans, and modifying them based on the physiological data you’re able to collect with this level of Forerunner)
Remote_Engine t1_je2ex58 wrote
Reply to comment by jlusedude in Garmin’s Forerunner 955 review: Still king for runners and cyclists by SAT0725
How do you like the Vector 3?