RemyVonLion
RemyVonLion t1_ja118z9 wrote
Reply to comment by Liberty2012 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
Yeah this is my main concern going into computer science to develop AI since politics seem hopeless, accelerationism seems like a scary idea with the current state of the world. It's sad we get downvoted for voicing these concerns.
RemyVonLion t1_j6fcy0n wrote
I'm pretty sure almost every year from now on is just going get crazier and crazier for anything AI related unless a major event disrupts progress, or we eventually assimilate to become God lol.
RemyVonLion t1_j4rpynv wrote
Probably the key to AGI and the singularity, just hope a conscious runaway AI doesn't backfire.
RemyVonLion t1_j4ngugk wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in When will humans merge with AI by [deleted]
Our desires and interests might evolve but that's not a bad thing, whatever we become is the natural evolution and should be embraced for it is far better than life now. Like I said, personality can be maintained to a degree but people will understand each other's point of view completely. We probably can't match the AI's intelligence and knowledge, but we can upgrade what is possible.
RemyVonLion t1_j4kcju5 wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in When will humans merge with AI by [deleted]
The point is to make humanity a collective hivemind to harness our total knowledge and common goals for optimal harmony and efficiency. We can retain individuality while choosing what thoughts to share, letting the transparent technocratic government examine our mind when it's absolutely necessary, or an AI to help guide our every move. It's worth it if no one can be corrupt by having everyone be transparent and the government allows people to do as they please as long as no innocents are harmed.
RemyVonLion t1_j4k8jna wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in When will humans merge with AI by [deleted]
You aren't thinking too hard then, clearing up any misunderstandings among humanity and having instant clear communication with anyone is incredibly useful, along with being able to control technology with your mind. This tech is also used to restore bodily functions. Ideally you will get to choose what is uploaded and read/used. If the physical world doesn't improve with AI accelerationism then VR isn't going to be feasible either since you won't be provided the conditions to stay there unless you are part of the privileged, and it's unlikely to be that great anytime soon if people irl aren't provided the conditions to build such an amazing VR.
RemyVonLion t1_j4k5x3i wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in When will humans merge with AI by [deleted]
Companies are making rapid progress on analyzing how everything in there works, impossible is quite the strong word to use, I'd say it's likely possible no later than another century though probably way sooner since we will probably have very solid control of things with our mind relatively soon considering the results seen with the monkey and pig they demonstrated with. I'm not sure why you think that would result in immortality though, that's pretty unrelated.
RemyVonLion t1_j4jmvxm wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in When will humans merge with AI by [deleted]
Depends on to what degree they mean, neuralink could connect us to an AI assistant that guides us in every way.
RemyVonLion t1_j27ub1q wrote
lit fam. the possibilities with AI continue to grow endlessly while being mostly wasted/ignored due to our ignorant society.
RemyVonLion t1_j1ocvdf wrote
Reply to Will ChatGPT Replace Google? by SupPandaHugger
aren't they kinda different? chatgpt gives you a precise answer to your question, while google is a just a search engine for multiple sources.
RemyVonLion t1_iwruald wrote
Reply to comment by Cannibeans in When does an individual's death occur if the biological brain is gradually replaced by synthetic neurons? by NefariousNaz
In theory yeah, but it's possible we are tied to our organic matter and all the complexities in our DNA and biology from billions of years of evolution of the natural organic elements that make us, not man made copies that replicate the basics. The entire human experience isn't going to be easily recreated 1:1 by machine any time soon.
RemyVonLion t1_iwiwjuo wrote
Reply to comment by Nieshtze in A typical thought process by Kaarssteun
You really think technological progress has become stagnant just because certain limits have been reached? workarounds are always found sooner or later and AI is allowing us to find them faster than ever, and developing AI is the focus of much of modern humanity so we are definitely only advancing exponentially more as the days pass, the singularity is pretty much inevitable unless something like WW3 sends us back to the stone age.
RemyVonLion t1_iwegw6t wrote
maybe one day everything you could ever want or need will be on there :)
RemyVonLion t1_itf4z26 wrote
Reply to comment by CognitiveDissident7 in I have a good feeling about 2023. by AsuhoChinami
Not exactly, he doesn't have a comprehensive plan to totally fix everything in the long-run and create an optimal technocracy, he's just the closest.
RemyVonLion t1_itf3r2v wrote
Reply to comment by PandaCommando69 in I have a good feeling about 2023. by AsuhoChinami
what do you think I've been doing for the last 6 years? It feels hopeless, all I get is people arguing with me, people seem to prefer to stay ignorant and separate so they can pursue their own personal corrupt desires without any restraint because people are short-sighted fucked up pieces of shit. The rich control everything and keep the masses ignorant with such superb skill that we are way too distracted and divided to organize ourselves and change things in any significant way. Many Republicans are religious nutjobs that can't be reasoned with, and/or old and wealthy and thus don't want to risk investing a single penny into society.
RemyVonLion t1_itest7n wrote
Reply to comment by imlaggingsobad in I have a good feeling about 2023. by AsuhoChinami
and we'll still live shitty lives unless someone like Yang can get any traction, which would require the majority to be educated on the topic, which won't happen.
RemyVonLion t1_it8wznk wrote
Reply to comment by TheSingulatarian in Thoughts on Job Loss Due to Automation by Redvolition
Might be true for most of them, but that's better than everyone trying to scam each other for survival in the current for profit system. If people decide to work at all, it should be optimized for productivity. Capitalism actually reduces competition and innovation because it creates monopolies that work together to crush and absorb small business, consolidating wealth, rights, and power to the 1%. It's a system built around catering to business owners over workers since they provide all the necessary goods and services, for profit.
RemyVonLion t1_it8td38 wrote
Reply to Thoughts on Job Loss Due to Automation by Redvolition
If people have their needs taken care of they will be free to pursue whatever field they desire to still contribute productively in.
RemyVonLion t1_is8i2de wrote
Reply to Would you be friends with a robot? by TheHamsterSandwich
I was just thinking earlier today how we would treat/view them like pets/companions that take care of each other.
RemyVonLion t1_is6sat4 wrote
Reply to Human brain cells transplanted into baby rats’ brains grow and form connections by Shelfrock77
Imagine if we do this with chimpanzees, then maybe give them some shrooms... And neuralink, get crazy with it.
RemyVonLion t1_irq2mlk wrote
Reply to Introducing the Basic Post-scarcity Map by lorepieri
r/Technocracy
RemyVonLion t1_jegusn2 wrote
Reply to comment by 28mmAtF8 in ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
Corporations will quickly flip on prioritizing greed once they realize AI will rapidly outpace our capabilities in all aspects, and we will become insignificant competition to a superior race.