At the risk of getting downvoted, I agree with you. It’s an imperfect change sure, but it’s a very simple courtesy to others.

Can’t believe the amount of anger/seethe your comment generated lol

> Shapiro’s version allows employees to accept food or refreshments when “representing the Commonwealth in an official capacity” worth as much or less than the federal government’s per diem rate. Those rates already serve as the basis for other state public service compensation levels — for instance, they’re the model for state House and Senate members’ per diem rates.

> The exact numbers vary by meal and location, ranging from as low as $13 to as high as $36.

Can't wait for idiots to misconstrue this as quasi-legalization of bribery/corruption

Please don’t let this idiocy give nuclear an even worse rep

This is why any such technology must be open-source

> Yeah, in an ideal world, young people would get the kind of broad education and life experience that comes with a college education (or similar life experience) before diving into the workforce. > >

I'd argue in an ideal world, we'd let young people get the education/experience necessary to exceed in the workplace by letting them dive into the workforce and giving them a chance to grow.

Correlation doesn’t equal causation, but correlation can suggest causation.

> Current smokers had a 36% lower risk of thyroid cancer compared to nonsmokers; risk was lower especially if they were also less than 65 years old.

Seems like they accounted for age

Jfc just build more housing

Flip the genders and the mood of this thread would be very different