You know where the door is, no one is begging you to stick around and take EU money.

Show of strength? Bruh, this is just insecurity on a state level. It's the government equivalent of writing a Reddit post about how you're a sniper with over 400 confirmed kills.

I'm really starting to doubt any Russian nukes actually work after it turned out the Moskova, their black sea flagship, went down because it's defenses either didn't work, were turned off because they interfered with Comms or had been scavenged for parts.

I wouldn't roll the dice on it, but it's really hard to believe they have anything that functions as intended at this point.

We're doing four day weeks in the UK now, you should get you some of this as well.

Antidepressants require a prescription but depression isn't developing SSRI resistance. It's not a measure we've taken to fight antibiotic resistance

Well, we've known about this for years and haven't bothered to do anything so far. What are the chances we act before it becomes a problem when acting is inconvenient?

His party is going to rip him apart for this, but credit where credit is due if he's found a solution where the other Muppets couldn't.

Ah, but you fail to consider that I said I'm not mad, thus I can't be.

> There are a lot of nuances in English and they seem to be lost on you. If she made no comment about her own views, I may have seen your point

You are very easily fooled by political doubletalk.

I doubt that very much. It takes a lot of qualifications that they don't have to understand the internet.

> Forbes had the right to say she wouldn't have voted for gay marriage due to religious views, and won't condemn someone expressing their views based on a religious stance

See, this is weasely. She wasn't asked to do that, she was asked if she condemned the views, not the right to express them.

> the more you shine a light on these views and debate

The light was shone, the equalities minister refused to then condemn or debate them.

Mate, what the fuck point are you trying to make? You're all over the place.

And we're allowed to criticise her for that. That's what you call free speech.

She specifically said she would have voted against same sex marriage. A vote is a political action.

Isn't freedom from criticism.

She wasn't asked to criticise them on their religious beliefs, she was asked about a political stance.

Edit: not that it would matter, the equalities act protects the right to hold religious beliefs and not be discriminated against for them. It doesn't make them immune to criticism, it's not blasphemy laws.

The equalities minister, everyone.

Since when?

Edit: damn. First poll is out and she is currently massively ahead despite a disaster start to her campaign she has had to apologise for.

There is no other actual discussion, why would anyone discuss opinions you form by just going with what kinda feels right?

Anyhow, this point it's pretty clear I'm basically talking to an advanced parrot, you can say the words but there's no real human thought behind them. I'm not wasting more time on that.

That's proving a negative, i.e. the nonexistent of Santa. You made a positive claim that you can't prove.

That's not proving a negative. You've said teenage girls have body image issues in every culture, so show me the data on body image issues in every culture. Or just admit you don't know if that's actually true.

You're the one making the claim. If you can't provide the evidence you based the claim on you're clearly just making things up.

How do you know it happens in every culture, do you have any data?

Oh no, he was definitely a kook. A ridiculous genius, but mans was weird.

Article title is nonsense, but particles do pop into and out of existence in a vacuum all the time. It's a pretty cool phenomenon.

Little man is milking his one moment of relevance way too hard at this point.