RoddyDost
RoddyDost t1_is57qcg wrote
Reply to comment by noactuallyitspoptart in Bruno Latour posed a major challenge to modern philosophy’s key assumption - a distinction between the human subject and the world. Philosophy as a field is yet to properly understand the importance of his contribution | Graham Harman. by IAI_Admin
I’m not letting /r/philosophy stand in for the field…more like letting it reinforce beliefs that I already held due to other reasons.
RoddyDost t1_is57mez wrote
Reply to comment by Sitrondrommen in Bruno Latour posed a major challenge to modern philosophy’s key assumption - a distinction between the human subject and the world. Philosophy as a field is yet to properly understand the importance of his contribution | Graham Harman. by IAI_Admin
For the last two years of my study I was reading primarily Heidegger, Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, and before that I was into social and political ethics. So no, I’ve never heard of him.
RoddyDost t1_is2u2zj wrote
Reply to Bruno Latour posed a major challenge to modern philosophy’s key assumption - a distinction between the human subject and the world. Philosophy as a field is yet to properly understand the importance of his contribution | Graham Harman. by IAI_Admin
I love how /r/philosophy is just filled with posts like this where some guy you’ve never heard of is “challenging” something, or proposes some idea that’s been discussed ad nauseum for literally thousands of years. This is why I stopped at my masters after deep dives into ethics and phenomenology—philosophy is amazing, but it is no longer a productive field of study, despite the delusions of academics that it is.
RoddyDost t1_is57z5b wrote
Reply to comment by srpollo18 in Bruno Latour posed a major challenge to modern philosophy’s key assumption - a distinction between the human subject and the world. Philosophy as a field is yet to properly understand the importance of his contribution | Graham Harman. by IAI_Admin
That’s incredible, any resources that you know of that discuss the topic?