Rohit901 t1_jcbxbxv wrote on March 15, 2023 at 7:01 PM

Reply to comment by 7thKingdom in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

Elon who invested 100m USD in it initially just tweeted the same haha that he’s confused about these turn of events at openAI

Rohit901 t1_jcbp1pl wrote on March 15, 2023 at 6:10 PM

Reply to comment by dlpettit in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

Lmao ahaha, but at the end of the day all the companies are XD

Rohit901 t1_jcarred wrote on March 15, 2023 at 2:42 PM

Reply to comment by Transmatrix in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

Google has mostly been transparent most of the time and has published lot of groundbreaking AI research to the public thus advancing the field. OpenAI on the other hand seems to be closed source and trying to compete directly with Google. Maybe in future, Google might not be willing to make its research public if things go like this and we don’t want power to be concentrated in a single company or person. Thus I hope we are able to get better open source models

Rohit901 t1_jc9hr90 wrote on March 15, 2023 at 6:42 AM

Reply to comment by Mapmaker51 in OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

Exactly I agree with you here. The performance of bing has been seriously underwhelming compared to just the standard Chat GPT, hence even though I have access to bing, I've got the chatGPT plus to try out GPT-4.. I think it should be much better than Bing.

Rohit901 t1_jc9cfm5 wrote on March 15, 2023 at 5:37 AM

Reply to OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

Imagine if google decided to not share their paper on transformers with the world, citing the same reasons as cited by open AI.

Rohit901 t1_jc9cdnr wrote on March 15, 2023 at 5:37 AM

Reply to OpenAI releases GPT-4, a multimodal AI that it claims is state-of-the-art by donnygel

I find bing to be underwhelming even though it uses gpt 4. Maybe because it’s tuned for search but most of the time it’s answers are pretty short and doesn’t go in depth as GPT 3.5. For technical or math problems as well bing doesn’t try to solve it properly.. which is frustrating

Rohit901 t1_j7ek7ix wrote on February 6, 2023 at 5:23 AM

Reply to [D] Yann Lecun seems to be very petty against ChatGPT by supersoldierboy94

Lol I kinda agree with you here, and Lecun reminds me of Sheldon from Big Bang theory who is constantly berating and insulting engineers (Howard)

Rohit901 t1_j31fljl wrote on January 5, 2023 at 11:52 AM

Reply to [Discussion] If ML is based on data generated by humans, can it truly outperform humans? by groman434

Machines doesn’t seem to think rationally and logically as we humans do. I’m not exactly sure about the exact research in this direction, but maybe it is possible to stimulate this rational/logical thinking by set of rules/discrete maths etc? (Like I’ve heard there are many theorem solvers which exists) But again it should be coded by humans right? it’s like expecting machines to be conscious of themselves, which at the current stage they aren’t.