Sadgasm1

Sadgasm1 OP t1_j1yfh7h wrote

Oh yeah generally youre right, but the data was also ‘doubled’ in this way. Because each row is a match, the variables are present for each team separately. For example: there’s attempts from outside the box by team1, and attempts from outside the box by team2. The pattern of relation should be symmetrical because these differences are arbitrary as you say.

1

Sadgasm1 OP t1_j1u8bjs wrote

Hi :)

I tried to extract 2 meaningful PC’s from 59 analytics of the matches (variables like ball possession, goal attempts… etc). Then I wanted to see if the matches are clustered on these predictors according to their outcome.

They aren’t 😕 but I liked the plot

−4