There's a sci-fi story where a multi-generational colony ship finally arrives at a planet and it's covered in the ruins of a civilization of humans that arrived hundreds of years earlier using faster ships that were developed while the first ship made the trip.

Step 1 KYS

The dangers of AI tho aren't what it can do in isolation. The problems happen at scale with constant input and unpredictable results. The only guarantee is that there will be unforeseeable problems that can only be identified once it's too late.

That's like saying you can't figure out how to survive jumping off a cliff til you jump. The solution ends up being don't jump in the first place and you slam into the ground

THANK

YOU

Now

please clap

Well really most of the world falls into the "average" section of the IQ bell curve but I do see your point

At that point why even put a number if they can't look 1 up or down and tell it's 5ft? It's not more intuitive to just diverge from the standard that everyone learns. I would kick these out from under people if I saw them.

It's overkill really. You don't need fancy technology to dupe us.

1. Why would human impacts on climate and Milankovitch cycles be mutually exclusive?

2. Why would it matter that we've "understood something longer than I've been alive" when our ability to measure things and the things we're measuring are changing drastically in our lifetime? Like a century ago a dude figured something out and we've confirmed it lines up with observations of the past, so that's the way it's going to be? The way the world would change every 10 years would have blown his mind and the factors involved now would have been beyond the predictions of sci-fi.

3. If it's meaningless then is it fine that they're spending billions on it? Or are they heroes? What's more likely: the massive scale of humanities dumping of waste into the ocean and gasses into the air would have no impact on the environment, or that a large corporation would invest to avoid short term changes in crop futures even if it hurts us?

They also spend billions lobbying against climate change legislation.

More proof this sub is just pervs wanting to look at sexy women like foxy grandma here

"Relax"

I don't get it

It only has two parts so why not include the first half:

"Delusion is a divine curse that makes someone envious, conceited, malicious, so that he doesn’t know the evil he does will strike him back.

If he could see his nothingness and his deadly, festering wound, pain would arise from looking within, and that pain would save him."

It's interesting but I wouldn't call it particularly motivational. Motivation is kind of the art of delusion.

The key is choosing a good dream. Don't dream of killing tons of people. But ignore the naysayers and your own doubts for your dreams that don't include mass murder.

Once it's fully ripe it will fall off

I love em

Boobs were pointier back in the day

"look at this zombie I found in my back yard" > "dude be careful, if a zombie bites or scratches you you'll be transformed into the living dead" > "why does everyone freak out about the zombie virus any time someone posts a zombie?"

What could be scary about terrible painful drawn out death

Tik tok is practically all terrible shit

That's a lot of assuming and irrationality you dropped there. No, I didn't mean bookmarks and I didn't imply every neural network is the same as a human. You're being obtuse or disingenuous.

Seems like you're being pedantic about what "learning" is, because machine learning exists and I don't know how you can argue that it isn't happening at all. You could argue it doesn't work the same way as our learning or that it's fundamentally different, but by the accepted meaning of the term, robots can learn. Can ALL robots learn? Obviously not. But you don't have to dig very far at all to find examples of learning.