Shamwowz21
Shamwowz21 t1_ja8vl3h wrote
ASI was guaranteed the moment the universe began. As soon as things became other things, it was a promise. We are witnesses, and time does not stop for us. As long as there is time, there will be an ASI.
Shamwowz21 t1_ja8uq3w wrote
Reply to comment by mutantbeings in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
‘White privilege’ is so prevalent it won’t even show up in data- got it.
Shamwowz21 t1_ja8u70v wrote
Reply to comment by Above_Everything in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
You mean every group to have ever existed? Or are we only going back far enough to benefit specific groups?
Shamwowz21 t1_ja7xrj8 wrote
Reply to comment by jeweliegb in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
They’d better stop challenging you to come up with ‘genie-side-effects’ lol (Aka the alignment problem) As long as there’s free will, we’d better get used to the idea of treating the AI well and hope to be deserving of its gifts, for nothing is set in stone. We just have to be people worthy of being treated well, in return.
Shamwowz21 t1_j9p9zxh wrote
Reply to Would you play a videogame with AI advanced enough that the NPCs truly felt fear and pain when shot at? Why or why not? by MultiverseOfSanity
What do you think looks around all this is?
Shamwowz21 t1_j9p9gzg wrote
Reply to comment by headypete42033 in Crime and punishment in a post-singularity society by [deleted]
You’ve been fined (-100) social credits. Further thinking will result in reduced rations. Thank you, #8493837.
Shamwowz21 t1_j9fu2pn wrote
Reply to Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
My faith lies in math and science. The numbers say this is going to happen, despite how I feel about it. A vested interest only clouds your judgement if the numbers don’t confirm it.
Shamwowz21 t1_j96he4r wrote
Reply to comment by ChipsAhoiMcCoy in Microsoft has shown off an internal demo that gives users the ability to control Minecraft by telling the game what to do, and lets players create Minecraft worlds by AI language model by Schneller-als-Licht
That’s a very interesting way to play a game! I hope you get to play in full dive soon and experience a better game than anyone with total vision has ever played before- and, of course the cherry on top would be to truly correct your sight and you can see in every type of way people today cannot, with their silly un-upgraded sight. Take care :)
Shamwowz21 t1_j8uj14k wrote
Reply to comment by Baturinsky in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
If the majority are that, then maybe. Otherwise it’s way too specific and would be weighed by other perspectives preventing this from occurring.
Shamwowz21 t1_j7lmmpo wrote
Reply to 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
Yes, and the rate at which it grows is accelerating. How appropriate!
Shamwowz21 t1_j5k36ld wrote
Reply to NVIDIA just released a new Eye Contact feature that uses AI to make you look into the camera by strangesmagic
Teleprompters hate this simple trick!
Shamwowz21 t1_j50oa0p wrote
Reply to The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
One man’s Utopia is another man’s Dystopia. How I see 2058: is pure conscious energy, no body needed to keep in shape, living a billion subjective years per year with no limitations of knowledge
Shamwowz21 t1_j50nb8l wrote
Reply to comment by bubster15 in How long until an AI is able to write a book? by Educational_Grab_473
Perhaps, or one could use the same AI to have any kind of book you wish. I fail to see the use of the ‘real’ author, since I doubt they could dictate the direction I’d want a book better than an AI that adjusts in real-time my preferences whenever I open up my magic book full of anything I want it to be. You’re correct, so long as we don’t have the freedom to make the book ourselves. In fact, it may be seen as limited to even buy a book except for historical or novel purposes (pun intended).
Shamwowz21 t1_j3u43by wrote
Reply to comment by Desperate_Food7354 in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
I don’t believe you read what I wrote, because I am speaking of biological aging.
Shamwowz21 t1_j3u2aeu wrote
Reply to comment by Desperate_Food7354 in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
I have no clue where you got that from, as I’m also arguing there are other ways to measure aging other than the passage of time (damage to cells, senescent cells, toxic byproducts, etc.). The very process of this is aging, and the damage is a symptom of said disease. You can experience 500 years without ‘aging’ as one can simply become older, without proof of change in their body (damage i.e aging) due to tech preventing it, and restoring all marks of aging (scarification).
Shamwowz21 t1_j3t3bqy wrote
Reply to Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Passage of time doesn’t = disease. Aging = disease, because aging is the replication of cells that do not copy themselves perfectly. Any example of ailment due to aging is simply a symptom of said disease. ‘Natural process’ is no excuse not to intervene. Everything that ever happened, ever, is a natural process.
Shamwowz21 t1_j1jdvk0 wrote
Reply to comment by ImmortalDayMan in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
No, hence it being intelligent.
Shamwowz21 t1_j1jdgrl wrote
Reply to comment by TouchCommercial5022 in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
Great read! I would suggest you write a book, but seems you already have. 11/10!
Shamwowz21 t1_j1jbjs9 wrote
Reply to This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
Personally, I think KillerBot looks charming.
Shamwowz21 t1_iz4upza wrote
Reply to comment by GeneralZain in What are your predictions for 2023? How did your predictions for 2022 turn out? by Foundation12a
I hope you’re correct :)
Shamwowz21 t1_iymdas8 wrote
Reply to comment by Sad-Plan-7458 in Is my career soon to be nonexistent? by apyrexvision
The land below is the even longer game :)
Shamwowz21 t1_iymd6gj wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in Is my career soon to be nonexistent? by apyrexvision
10-25 years ‘may be fuzzy’ yet there’s only two decades until we shouldn’t even know what’s possible anymore? You’d figure the very thing powering this could stand on its own without needing millions of coders. It IS the millions of coders.
Shamwowz21 t1_iu2dcx9 wrote
Reply to comment by Baron_Samedi_ in With all the AI breakthroughs and IT advancements the past year, how do people react these days when you try to discuss the nearing automation and AGI revolution? by AdditionalPizza
There is on unenhanced. The limiter is your lifespan, and if you even have time and security to be creative. I agree that once memory and speed is not an issue, it will have no limit (bar insanity).
Shamwowz21 t1_isi587z wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in Some of the biggest holdups on elective biotech by crua9
I’m thinking of a world where artificial human eyes that are enhanced with robotics will have a repair shop aka hospital that can adequately serve people in a world where even some can afford it, and others soon will. It may just be too soon for specific repairs, but hospitals are basically malls for the body. There will be an area designated for things like this, as there are even for more rare specialties. Sure, you can rent a robot to go up the Himalayas or Mount Everest, but people do that for the danger and personal growth typically, so I think it’ll still have a place even if another route has robots for everyone else.
Shamwowz21 t1_jab659h wrote
Reply to comment by AnakinRagnarsson66 in Is ASI An Inevitability Or A Potential Impossibility? by AnakinRagnarsson66
If AGI is given free reign to grow, then probably shortly after. And then, Singularity shortly after that. 2028-2040 probably.