Shamwowz21

Shamwowz21 t1_ja7xrj8 wrote

They’d better stop challenging you to come up with ‘genie-side-effects’ lol (Aka the alignment problem) As long as there’s free will, we’d better get used to the idea of treating the AI well and hope to be deserving of its gifts, for nothing is set in stone. We just have to be people worthy of being treated well, in return.

2

Shamwowz21 t1_j96he4r wrote

That’s a very interesting way to play a game! I hope you get to play in full dive soon and experience a better game than anyone with total vision has ever played before- and, of course the cherry on top would be to truly correct your sight and you can see in every type of way people today cannot, with their silly un-upgraded sight. Take care :)

1

Shamwowz21 t1_j50oa0p wrote

One man’s Utopia is another man’s Dystopia. How I see 2058: is pure conscious energy, no body needed to keep in shape, living a billion subjective years per year with no limitations of knowledge

12

Shamwowz21 t1_j50nb8l wrote

Perhaps, or one could use the same AI to have any kind of book you wish. I fail to see the use of the ‘real’ author, since I doubt they could dictate the direction I’d want a book better than an AI that adjusts in real-time my preferences whenever I open up my magic book full of anything I want it to be. You’re correct, so long as we don’t have the freedom to make the book ourselves. In fact, it may be seen as limited to even buy a book except for historical or novel purposes (pun intended).

1

Shamwowz21 t1_j3u2aeu wrote

I have no clue where you got that from, as I’m also arguing there are other ways to measure aging other than the passage of time (damage to cells, senescent cells, toxic byproducts, etc.). The very process of this is aging, and the damage is a symptom of said disease. You can experience 500 years without ‘aging’ as one can simply become older, without proof of change in their body (damage i.e aging) due to tech preventing it, and restoring all marks of aging (scarification).

1

Shamwowz21 t1_j3t3bqy wrote

Passage of time doesn’t = disease. Aging = disease, because aging is the replication of cells that do not copy themselves perfectly. Any example of ailment due to aging is simply a symptom of said disease. ‘Natural process’ is no excuse not to intervene. Everything that ever happened, ever, is a natural process.

1

Shamwowz21 t1_iymd6gj wrote

10-25 years ‘may be fuzzy’ yet there’s only two decades until we shouldn’t even know what’s possible anymore? You’d figure the very thing powering this could stand on its own without needing millions of coders. It IS the millions of coders.

1

Shamwowz21 t1_isi587z wrote

I’m thinking of a world where artificial human eyes that are enhanced with robotics will have a repair shop aka hospital that can adequately serve people in a world where even some can afford it, and others soon will. It may just be too soon for specific repairs, but hospitals are basically malls for the body. There will be an area designated for things like this, as there are even for more rare specialties. Sure, you can rent a robot to go up the Himalayas or Mount Everest, but people do that for the danger and personal growth typically, so I think it’ll still have a place even if another route has robots for everyone else.

1