The github link is broken. That was also the reason I didn´t include it in the post. The paper is not from me! Also searched on paperswithcode but they also dont have a working link.

Edit the link is working now: https://github.com/facebookresearch/NPM !

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mRwJce3npmzbKfxws/efficientzero-how-it-works

A lesswrong article I have found that explains how efficient zero works.

In my opinion the author wants to say that systems like efficient zero are more efficient in their data usage and could be used for llm also to increase their sample efficiency.

To be honest I hope that my post gets so much attention that the author of the paper can answer our questions.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Couhhp4pPHbbhJ2Mg/will-we-run-out-of-ml-data-evidence-from-projecting-dataset Lesswrong discussion about the paper.

Yes they mentioned it at the end of their blog article. But I think it was only meant as an example how better sample efficiency could be achieved and not SOTA related.

I prefer: Identity Theory, Cognitivism, Higher Order Theory and Funktionalism

These theories single or in combination could explain consciousness in my opinion. But in the end the science community has to decide how valid this and other patters are. After that we should be able to look for consciousness in machine intelligences and other liveforms. ( Added this comment for clearification of the other comment I made moments ago. I hope that helps. )

Lets say science detemines in the future that consciousness is just thoughts about thoughts ( Higher oder Theory ) then you could look after that pattern or functionality in artifical neural networks and this way determine if that machine is conscious or not. In a way there a possible consciousness patterns that need to be determined if the are valid or a few of them together ( the ones I prefer ( Infografic ) in combination are a logical answer to me ) . After that you only need to look after these patterns in machine intelligences or other live forms. It´s only pattern matching and validation after that. I don´t accept magic or metaphysic as an answer for consciousness because metaphysic will become just physic when the definitive answer is found what consciousness is.

I think posts like this are important to be able to determine in the future whether a machine has developed consciousness. As well as to help create AIs with consciousness or to find out if the already developed AI has consciousness. It would also help in answering the question if the Proto-AGI proposed here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DeepNetGroup/permalink/1773531039706437/ would already have consciousness!

u/yuli-ban I am intested in your opinion of the following link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DeepNetGroup/permalink/1773531039706437/ Do you think something like that will or could be realised next year? Also what do you think about that rumor about GPT-4: https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/ysoyq4/the_ceo_of_openai_had_dropped_hints_that_gpt4_due/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

The proto-AGI could wih its long term memory and ability to grow its neural network should be able to programm much better than Codex or alpha-code. While also understanding the software achtitectures much better and thus be able to help create a monolithic (solved in one architecture and not like the proto-AGI that is more like a patchwork of different programms) AGI that is maybe build a little like https://futureai.guru/technologies/brian-simulator-ii-open-source-agi-toolkit/ but much better scalable and usable and thus 2-3 orders of magnitude faster and effective ( maybe even usable for robots by then ).

The idea of scratch pads https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.00114.pdf was also quite simple but it got made into a paper! A paper is usually made in a way that clarifies the concept. A simple post without proof or even a link to the code can´t deliver the needed clearity.

Github Link or a paper? You don´t even have a screenshot of the conversations or how the code works. As long as that is the case I will not give you an upvote!

I only don´t give you a downvote right now because I like the idea.