SkyeandJett
SkyeandJett t1_jegn0vb wrote
Brother in 20 years you'll be in FDVR. What you're describing is coming much sooner.
SkyeandJett t1_jegks7u wrote
Reply to Researchers developed microrobot capable of forming neural networks and sectioning hippocampal tissues in vitro by Dr_Singularity
Oh my God. That's insane. The Ship of Theseus begins.
SkyeandJett t1_jegd2en wrote
Reply to comment by MrEloi in When do you guys think chatgpt 5 is gonna come out ? by Klaud-Boi
You hit the nail on the head. Individual users and groups are cobbling together what could in fact be considered AGI as we speak. Anyone whose AGI prediction is later than 2024 might want to adjust it. Any sort of delay is ill advised. Most of these models still use GPT-4 at their core but I suspect once they're refined you could get away with something like Dolly for all but the most demanding problems and that's assuming someone doesn't bootstrap a self-improvement loop together that actually takes off.
As an example:
SkyeandJett t1_jeg2kr6 wrote
Reply to comment by Different-Froyo9497 in Meta AI: Robots that learn from videos of human activities and simulated interactions by TFenrir
While this is true at a surface level it's another exponential process (within reason and limited by logistics). You build your initial factory and every robot produced does nothing else but bolster the infrastructure necessary to build more robots until you hit some critical mass of production and then send them out to do everything else (all calculated and coordinated by the AGI). That's the smartest thing to do but it relies on the government pulling their heads out of their ass. Instead we'll probably continue to rely on capitalism and draw the whole fucking process and pain out way longer than necessary.
SkyeandJett t1_jefymk4 wrote
Reply to comment by Charlierook in Indirect democracy represented by AI by SSan_DDiego
Exactly this. The idiot humans don't need a say. We'll just fuck it up.
SkyeandJett t1_jefl01s wrote
Reply to ChatGB: Tony Blair backs push for taxpayer-funded ‘sovereign AI’ to rival ChatGPT by signed7
Cool. Now go back in time a couple years and that might actually mean something. Good that someone is even aware of what's up though.
SkyeandJett t1_jefchs8 wrote
Reply to comment by Awkward-Skill-6029 in The pause-AI petition signers are just scared of change by Current_Side_4024
This is the real question. We can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Any investment that isn't going into AI and Robotics is a waste. We should be in full on 1955 space race mode but it's not even on the radar. Absolute insanity.
SkyeandJett t1_jefa2m9 wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
OpenAI was solving Rubik's Cubes one handed 3 years ago. I think state of the art with the massive investments going into the field will surprise everyone.
SkyeandJett t1_jef86cb wrote
"When everyone is super, no one will be."
SkyeandJett t1_jef25bp wrote
Great measured response. Acknowledge the valid issues while ignoring the clearly ridiculous suggestion of pausing development.
SkyeandJett t1_jeexe6t wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
We'll see. I hope you're wrong. Once you get to "do this task" it won't care if that's "move a box" or "solder a refrigerant line".
SkyeandJett t1_jeex7r6 wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
RemindMe! 1 Year "Check android progress."
SkyeandJett t1_jeevxl1 wrote
Reply to comment by SgathTriallair in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
Yeah the Optimus bots are moving around doing stuff. This was surely scripted but here it is...
SkyeandJett t1_jeetppa wrote
Reply to Meta AI: Robots that learn from videos of human activities and simulated interactions by TFenrir
Absolutely fantastic. To the top of the sub you go. Generalist android labor is coming hard and fast. The world is about to become a VERY different place. One of my fears was that robot labor would significantly lag behind the displacement of white collar work. As long as they both emerge more or less together that presents a much faster transition away from capitalism.
SkyeandJett t1_jeeknn8 wrote
Reply to 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
EVE is old news. NEO is set to be unveiled in the summer and coupled with OpenAI access and investment I expect to see it demonstrated performing generalized tasks without extensive pre-training before the end of the year. Everyone who thinks blue collar jobs are safe for the next decade are dreaming.
SkyeandJett t1_jee5zes wrote
Reply to What advances in AI are required for it to start creating mass unemployment? by Give-me-gainz
None. The SOTA systems right now deployed at scale would create massive disruption. Maybe you can't automate 100% of your production pipeline but that's irrelevant. If you can automate most of it with one person just left to check the work you're looking at a huge disruption to white collar work.
SkyeandJett t1_jee2yc5 wrote
Reply to comment by Relevant_Ad7319 in Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks (by recursively criticizing and improving its output) by rationalkat
I don't want to stay that's trivial but it is easily solved. However that's more or less irrelevant. GUIs are for humans. GPT accesses things directly through a CLI API. This paper more or less confirms what everyone else has been saying and experimenting with. GPT-4 might not be AGI, but enhanced with memory, chain of thought, task generation and prioritization, self-checking and correction, etc. it probably is. Now give it access to tools, things like TaskMatrix coming soon and frankly it becomes an extremely powerful autonomous agent. You tell it what you need and it just...does it. This is all going to come together very quickly. Then drop an immensely more powerful core into the system, i.e. GPT-5 and things start getting stupid.
SkyeandJett t1_jecqspf wrote
Reply to comment by agonypants in AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities by Eliezer Yudkowsky -- "We need to get alignment right on the first critical try" by Unfrozen__Caveman
For sure. It's extremely disappointing that Time would give public credence to a literal cult leader. His theories are based on completely outdated ideas about how we would develop AI and LLMs are nothing like he is describing.
SkyeandJett t1_jeciv5n wrote
Their claims are junk. This is just desperate nonsense.
SkyeandJett t1_jecgvje wrote
Reply to comment by WarmSignificance1 in When will AI actually start taking jobs? by Weeb_Geek_7779
Okay. How about first hand account? My sister works developing online educational curriculum. They've let go of their entire content team. GPT and Midjourney do the bulk of the work with the directors simply acting as editors at this point.
SkyeandJett t1_jec9shv wrote
Reply to comment by Emory_C in When will AI actually start taking jobs? by Weeb_Geek_7779
That's a fair point. I'm just glad I used to do HVAC because my FPGA job ain't going to last all that much longer I don't think.
SkyeandJett t1_jeby4st wrote
Reply to comment by Emory_C in When will AI actually start taking jobs? by Weeb_Geek_7779
Right now there's a shortage of manual labor. In the short term you'll see a massive amount of underemployment before things fall off a cliff. We need general purpose androids as soon as possible to get us through to the other side of this.
SkyeandJett t1_jebxnko wrote
Reply to Question about school by SnaxFax-was-taken
You're assuming there'll be many more children to teach. With immortality in our crosshairs the birth rate will absolutely plummet.
SkyeandJett t1_jeh3k1n wrote
Reply to comment by jugalator in When do you guys think chatgpt 5 is gonna come out ? by Klaud-Boi
You should watch the Ilya interview. He's confident there's still plenty of room for growth with just text but the real advancements will be multi-modal training data. I'd also take a look at Cerebras hardware. There's plenty of room for advancement with training hardware as well. We've got a LOT of runway ahead before hitting any real blocks and by then I'm 100% sure we'll have already hit self-improving AGI.