Your first paragraph is simply wrong. The chart looks identical with 9,10 or 11 year moving averages. Data source is there if you want to plot it up yourself.
You can’t see a 22 year year cycle on a 10 year moving average.
That’s wrong. It’s a 3652 day moving avg, so that takes care of the leap year. Even if it were an issue, and it’s not, it at most could impact it at most a small percent of 1/3652.
I would be interested to see some data showing a correlation between the solar cycle and global warming metics. Last month had a higher monthly total than any month in the previous cycle.
[OC]10 year moving average sea ice extent.
Snoo_94483 OP t1_j6phxv3 wrote
Reply to comment by mediandude in [OC]10 year moving average sea ice extent. by Snoo_94483
Your first paragraph is simply wrong. The chart looks identical with 9,10 or 11 year moving averages. Data source is there if you want to plot it up yourself.
You can’t see a 22 year year cycle on a 10 year moving average.