Sotyka94
Sotyka94 t1_izp6jb3 wrote
Reply to comment by SpecialNose9325 in Pixel Fold renders arrive with detailed size and spec rumors for Google’s foldable phone, by SUPRVLLAN
That's the flip. That's a completely different story than a fold. We talk about the fold, and it's much more.
With fold you have a standard phone that you can open up to a tablet if needed. With he flip you have a 1k$ cube that is not really functional and you can open it up to a normal phone. The flip is stupid, the fold is something I really like.
Sotyka94 t1_izj4nlw wrote
Reply to comment by SpecialNose9325 in Pixel Fold renders arrive with detailed size and spec rumors for Google’s foldable phone, by SUPRVLLAN
1000$ where? Lowest I seen is 1500
Sotyka94 t1_izg9ib7 wrote
Reply to Pixel Fold renders arrive with detailed size and spec rumors for Google’s foldable phone, by SUPRVLLAN
Get a good ~400$ midrange phone, slap a folding screen on it, and sell it for like ~600$.
This trend is not gonna catch up if the entry point is 1500$
Sotyka94 t1_iztn2b8 wrote
Reply to comment by SpecialNose9325 in Pixel Fold renders arrive with detailed size and spec rumors for Google’s foldable phone, by SUPRVLLAN
It's stupid because the fold get's a useful item (smartphone), and makes it multiuse (smartphone + tablet in one device), adding to it's use cases.
The flip takes an useful item (smartphone) and adds unnecessary complexity and price without adding any functionality, basically subtracting from it's usefulness without adding any real value to it.