We can’t even collectively agree to stop burning down the only house we can live in because the people with the power benefit while the rest of us deal with the consequences. I feel like it will go exactly the same way with AI.
I read a headline earlier that firms are actively recruiting “AI whisperers” to better hone the responses for AI and for AI users, and paying huge salaries to those people.
The cat is already out of the bag. Effective regulations should have been in place already, but governments are famously reactive, as opposed to proactive.
So, like most things in this world, the rich will get richer from it, and everyone else will have to deal with the consequences of it when it goes to shit.
Spasticwookiee t1_je8op7d wrote
Reply to ChatGPT-4's Response to NYT Article: Addressing AI Challenges and Ensuring Ethical Development by Hot-Pea1271
We can’t even collectively agree to stop burning down the only house we can live in because the people with the power benefit while the rest of us deal with the consequences. I feel like it will go exactly the same way with AI.
I read a headline earlier that firms are actively recruiting “AI whisperers” to better hone the responses for AI and for AI users, and paying huge salaries to those people.
The cat is already out of the bag. Effective regulations should have been in place already, but governments are famously reactive, as opposed to proactive.
So, like most things in this world, the rich will get richer from it, and everyone else will have to deal with the consequences of it when it goes to shit.