I live in the US, there’s more than enough work to go around. Testing while laying down asphalt is a little bit late, though.

Can’t tell scale from the pic, but I had rail and stile router bits for smaller doors that looked similar-there are different styles. With solid fixtures they worked great, Amana or Freud i think.

Can’t tell scale from the pic, but I had rail and stile router bits for smaller doors that looked similar-there are different styles. With solid fixtures they worked great, Amana or Freud i think.

Honestly, I would not diy this one. Get a temporary solid core door and find a well-recommended shop to swap them out. That frame and panel door was poorly constructed and needs to be rebuilt by an experienced pro. There’s no good reason for ft to fail like that.

Look up rail and stile router bits, used to make frame and panel doors.

Did this last summer. For part of the wall that is a storage closet we used primer and regular interior paint, looks fine. For the more finished area we used plaster weld, skim coated with compound, sanded, then primer and paint. Came out great, looks like the Sheetrock walls.

NP

Don’t know why you want to put a sleeve in the part you’re attaching to the wall. It seems overly complicated to me and difficult to attach.

Just use longer bolts. Anchors are engineered to be fully embedded.

Are you sure the ceiling trim for the fan can’t accommodate the bigger box? Most I’ve installed could.

I would say that’s a small price to pay. The wand+motorized head will save you a lot of pain, one reason pros use them.

Google “drywall sander with vacuum”. If you don’t plan to use it for more than the one job you can get a cheap one.

The US was never been invaded from the time it became a nation, without nukes. North Korea forced an end to the war they arguably started with help from the CCCP, and were not invaded afterwards, again without a nuclear deterrent. European politics are…historically complex and putting a finger one one element- nuclear weapons- as the core reason for post WW2 stability is overly simplistic.

Saying that nuclear weapons “only need to be in working order” is another oversimplification. Maintaining and protecting a nuclear arsenal requires not only huge amounts of money, educating people to be qualified to do so, maintaining a security apparatus to protect that arsenal, but also a system to develop, evaluate and effect upgrades to aging systems. Let’s not leave out the incidental costs of having these weapons around, like poisoning of individuals and communities, which also need to be considered in a full accounting. If you leave out the most important costs and only list “there might be a monster under my bed…someday”, that’s not a valid cost benefit analysis.

Actually, logically no sane nation should want to build a nuclear arsenal. I’ve never seen a comprehensive cost analysis, but from r&d, testing, implementation, security, cleanup, and many costs I haven’t thought of, the nuclear powers have to have spent countless trillions on the game of my dick is bigger than yours, realizing too late they can’t use them. Given a clear picture of how badly nuclear weapons would hobble your country’s progress with no benefit that good diplomacy could achieve, the cost benefit analysis seems pretty obvious to me.

I Am Not A Nuclear Weapons Expert.

Seems questionable in terms of international law, even if the Royal Navy just left the engines running and steamed away.