SquidTips

SquidTips OP t1_j5x9x3q wrote

I own a house, but I have consistently voted for every increase in housing taxes to support the government and services it provides.

Every law that passes shouldn't NEED to help EVERY person, that's not how you build just and equitable systems.

2

SquidTips OP t1_j5w9adb wrote

To answer that question requires first asking, what are roads for anyway?

The answer I think most people would give is that they are a logistical investment that our community has made in order to move humans from one place to another across our communities. That seems to be the logic behind creating commuter and bus only lanes, to proiritize throughput over individual 'Fairness'.

From this lens, lane splitting demonstrably reduces traffic by allowing greater throughput. It also incentivizes more motorcycle usage which creates a positive feedback loop for reducing traffic.

−11

SquidTips OP t1_j5vlsk8 wrote

What you’ve demonstrated here is that motorcycle fatalities are a problem on WA roads, and that is what lane splitting and filtering demonstrably to reduce.

By educating riders on when and how to safely filter through traffic, motorcycle accidents become less fatal, because they are happening at lower speeds. This reality is born out in the UC Berkeley study linked in the above post: > Lane-splitting motorcyclists were also injured much less frequently during their collisions. Lanesplitting riders were less likely to suffer head injury (9% vs 17%), torso injury (19% vs 29%), extremity injury (60% vs 66%), and fatal injury (1.2% vs 3.0%). Lane-splitting motorcyclists were equally likely to suffer neck injury, compared with non-lane-splitting motorcyclists.

−12