Squidworth89

Squidworth89 t1_ja7xrbk wrote

It’s not the employers job to keep up with housing. A coffee is a coffee and prices tend to be pretty uniform between different cost of living areas.

Voters could solve housing by voting/pushing for denser housing. However when push comes to shove even people who own homes and complain about the cost of housing often vote against it because it might negatively impact their housing values.

Zoning is used to protect/inflate home values of the haves. The article even touches on that where it would cost $13,000 extra in fees to add a more normal sized unit.

−4

Squidworth89 t1_j70m05h wrote

The lack of housing currently isn’t like it’s always been, controlled by the rental industry.

2008 crash left a multimillion unit hole that was never filled.

Combined with a lot of people leaving the building industry and never returning back then and a shortage of new blood entering the industry there isn’t enough labor power to keep up, let alone catch up.

3

Squidworth89 t1_j6y9szs wrote

Mortgage lenders look for 35ish% debt to income. Some will go up to 45%. Even 50% sometimes.

The first one is very reasonable. The second two imo are borderline irresponsible.

Their rent payment doesn’t matter for getting a mortgage.

If they can’t get a mortgage; it’s either their income isn’t high enough to keep housing to an acceptable percentage or they have other debt issues.

That system isn’t the problem. That’s all very fair. Remember; just because they’re paying rent doesn’t really mean they can afford that rent. A lot of people are paying more rent than they should.

Which leads to the biggest issue being zoning and a lack of units leading to higher prices which have nothing to do with mortgages and is something they have a say in through voting.

7

Squidworth89 t1_j6xzhxg wrote

My mum has a house in San Diego. It’s worth over a million.

The house is a shitty little 800sf from like the 60s… it’s the land.

Zoning and density is the number one issue. It’ll still be expensive though. Material and labor prices are high. But ten story buildings with hundreds of units be far more efficient.

19

Squidworth89 t1_j6x4r5a wrote

Outside of a trade that four years of experience isn’t going to get you far over the long run. You’re not going to have the benefits teachers have day one.

Teachers go from college to into a classroom by themselves. They have no real teaching skills post college… they learn with the into the frying pan approach. College is all theory and little practice. Which is fine. But don’t over value paper. I personally wouldn’t want my kids to have a teacher with < 3 years on the job experience.

1