If machine wouldn't having a pattern hurt you? If random, try to be random. Would this not offer some kind of marginal benefit? Because very low probability of answer always being C, etc? I guess not..?

Okay, why is selecting a straight line of 'C's better than filling in with no rhyme or reason (like the test probably would have looked like if you actually took it?) I think this is what my question boils down to.

If everything is 1/4 why would always choosing the same answer increase your chances? (Ignoring the whole 'C' is actually a better guess findings.) It doesn't right?-

Okay, why is selecting a straight line of 'C's better than filling in with no rhyme or reason like the test would have looked if you actually took it? I think this is what my question boils down to.

Words are getting a bit too big for five year old. Lol Thank you for your response. But still I ask: Is there no marginable percentage increase if I do, say B and C for my answers and go through and randomly select a few B's along side majority C's? Given you have reasonable expectation that the correct answers won't be a straight line of ALL C's. Would this not give any slight increase in score? Given answers are distributed randomly.

Is there no marginable percentage increase if I do, say B and C for my answers and go through and randomly select a few B's along side majority C's? Given you have reasonable expectation that the correct answers won't be a straight line of ALL C's. Would this not give any slight increase in score? Given answers are distributed randomly.

I understand this and it makes sense but is there no marginable percentage increase if do, say B and C for my answer and go through and randomly select a few B's along side majority C's. Given you have reasonable expectation that the correct answers won't be a straight line of ALL C's. Would this not give any slight increase in score?