I'm fine with blood. Doesn't bother me at all. If you decided to read my comments, you would see I was merely giving OP some advice on more effective argument methods. OP wanted to inform others that he thought the movie was good and opened up with talking about the amount of blood in the fight scenes. I simply told OP that focusing on other cinematic aspects would strengthen his argument far more than talking about the amount of blood involved.

That being said, I haven't seen the movie yet. It's on my watch list. I wouldn't be able to appropriately acknowledge or discuss any racial undertones related to the film. It seems like you have a pretty strong opinion about it, however. I will make sure to keep that in mind when watching the movie to try and see where your critiques are coming from. I'm sorry to hear the movie bothered you so much because of the race selection for the protagonist. The good thing is, Hollywood has been making strides in terms of improving the diversity of movie leads and protagonists. Hopefully, they continue to do so, and you find more films that suit your tastes moving forward.

No it's not. People are naturally squeamish and have a hard time looking at blood. Maybe not a majority of people, but there is a large contingency of folks that have a hard time with blood and gore. There are a lot of people that love movies and watch movies but avoid the horror and over the top action movies that I'm sure have seen more movies than you and I combined. I would consider them seasoned regardless of they could handle blood or not. I bet we could roll through RT or another movie rating site for this film or another like 300 and we would find people giving it out reviews for the violent stuff but few people praising it for the blood and gore.

Brother, you're missing the point. I'm saying that most people aren't going to rate a film positively based on the amount of blood. I would go as far as to say that most people would rate a film lower for gratuitous amounts of blood, honestly. If that's your thing, I guess that's fine, but don't use it as a talking point when trying to persuade other people on the quality of a film. It's certainly not something that most people will see as a big positive and hurts your argument more than helps it.

1. No spoiler tag?
2. If "having a lot of blood" is your bar for a good movie versus a bad one, I'm not sure how much I can take your movie opinion seriously. If it's also a little unsettling that something like that is so highly rated in your eyes. You made other okay points about other features in the movie, but I would avoid mentioning "a lot of blood" as a reason for rating a movie positively in the future. That's not exactly a deciding factor for most people and probably more often a deterrent than attractant.

Your -17 Karma says otherwise lmao. They say "any publicity is good publicity." I'm going to grab my popcorn and see if they are right.

Has a link to YouTube video, has name of company as reddit username. You're right though you aren't trying to market anything. Have fun with the rapidly dropping Karama and trying to get people to follow you with that.

This screams of an attempt at marketing to get people to engage and click on their Reddit profile to see what it's all about. yawn I think I'll pass on this one.

This has to be troll just for the Karma and comment farming.

It will all depend on what you like about FF games. If you like the single-player RPG experience, you won't get that with FF14. However, it has everything else you know and love from FF games with the added benefit of being an online game that involves a large community.

Yes, first thing that stood out to me was the absence of 10 and 12 from this list as well.