StrangerThanGene
StrangerThanGene t1_j9qr0pe wrote
Pretty sure everything has a link to mental health.
StrangerThanGene t1_j64249m wrote
Reply to comment by VanillaElectrical331 in Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers - Some publishers also banning use of bot in preparation of submissions but others see its adoption as inevitable by speckz
Because you were already doing it...
StrangerThanGene t1_j63xi3b wrote
Reply to comment by VanillaElectrical331 in Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers - Some publishers also banning use of bot in preparation of submissions but others see its adoption as inevitable by speckz
>My laser cutter failed to properly cut through some Perspex
...
> in my experience failure is in some sense always the impetus
The impetus was whatever made you want the cut Perspex in the first place. The failure was just a hindrance.
StrangerThanGene t1_j63uzse wrote
Reply to comment by VanillaElectrical331 in Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers - Some publishers also banning use of bot in preparation of submissions but others see its adoption as inevitable by speckz
>After all, failure necessitates change.
No, it really doesn't. And that's important.
Failure isn't the impetus - it's a consequence.
StrangerThanGene t1_j63ug9r wrote
Reply to comment by VanillaElectrical331 in Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers - Some publishers also banning use of bot in preparation of submissions but others see its adoption as inevitable by speckz
No, necessity is. Laziness is the mother of failure.
StrangerThanGene t1_j63sr9p wrote
Reply to Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers - Some publishers also banning use of bot in preparation of submissions but others see its adoption as inevitable by speckz
ChapGPT is the culmination of human's efforts to be as lazy as reality will allow.
StrangerThanGene t1_j4vw39b wrote
Reply to comment by SatiricalComment in It is likely future schools will view AI writers like spell check by [deleted]
So you type out everything for an AI prompt... But can't type an email?
StrangerThanGene t1_j4vac81 wrote
Reply to comment by SatiricalComment in It is likely future schools will view AI writers like spell check by [deleted]
>using AI to help write emails to coworkers and pharmaceutical companies
How does an AI write an email without knowing what I want to say? And if it's just a template, we already use them.
StrangerThanGene t1_j4tq0xy wrote
Reply to comment by SatiricalComment in It is likely future schools will view AI writers like spell check by [deleted]
>People in high stress jobs could certainly use the extra time such as healthcare workers.
Can you describe how you see using AI writers to save them time?
StrangerThanGene t1_j4tkrxd wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in It is likely future schools will view AI writers like spell check by [deleted]
It's 2023.
The spell-check changed impetus to impotence - two entirely different words with two entirely different meanings because I typed 'impotus.'
You're talking about a future where based on this concept... we're going to start using AI for homework... which directly contradicts the entire point of homework and it's going to be normal in academia.
Dude, have you seen what the Chromebooks in schools are actually used for? It isn't education.
StrangerThanGene t1_j4tjuos wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in It is likely future schools will view AI writers like spell check by [deleted]
That's not what I said at all, Captain Hyperbole.
StrangerThanGene t1_j4thlq0 wrote
Reply to comment by crua9 in It is likely future schools will view AI writers like spell check by [deleted]
Well, the spell-check changing impetus to impotence is a perfect example.
StrangerThanGene t1_j4th3if wrote
I hope... not? Hell, I'd push to return to handwriting essays before getting onboard with whatever they are calling AI these days. I feel like what you're describing is the actual impetus to something like Idiocracy.
*Case in point - spell check changed impetus to impotence.
StrangerThanGene t1_j2xd0da wrote
Reply to comment by HanaBothWays in Why TikTok’s future has never been so cloudy by prehistoric_knight
>The internal ByteDance report, as first reported by the New York Times, found that the employees accessed IP addresses and other data of two U.S.-based reporters via their TikTok accounts — one for BuzzFeed News and one at the Financial Times — along with several individuals connected to the reporters.
This should be even more concerning. ByteDance is a company that allows employees user-access to database entries.
This is... wildly unsecure. Screw the employees, how in the hell did they even have access to client IP information? It's literally not something any employee would ever have cause to access. This is why we write functions to handle traffic.
The fact that this happened at all should be setting off every alarm bell and red flag you have about data security.
StrangerThanGene t1_j1ryera wrote
I think the first question we should probably ask is should we be trying to reduce polarization?
StrangerThanGene t1_jaesj5r wrote
Reply to What is Robert DeNiro’s best performance? by [deleted]
Godfather Part II