SuperDave310

SuperDave310 t1_j99y5ki wrote

Contrary to the posts here, most professional reviewers and consumers do not rate speed queen machines highly.

https://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/speed-queen.html

“Well, Yale Appliance says that it sold 243 of these machines in 2018 and performed 65 service calls—a service rate of about 27 percent, which makes Speed Queen the most repair-prone brand that Yale Appliance has sold in any significant volume.”

https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/speed-queen-review/

10

SuperDave310 t1_j8c097z wrote

Excellent company but some of the men’s sizing is all over the place and really oddly shaped. The arms are strangely long on the better sweater and other items so it’s hard to buy online, but if you have access to an REI they have a lot to try on in person.

2

SuperDave310 t1_j6lkje0 wrote

“The reason is, largely, survivor bias:

Survivor bias refers to the tendency to focus on the examples of something that have survived while ignoring those that did not. In the context of understanding how things were made in the past, survivor bias can lead to a number of mistakes, including:

Overestimating the success rate of historical products or processes: For example, if you only examine the tools or artifacts that have been well-preserved over time, you may think that all tools or artifacts from a certain period were of high quality, when in fact many were not. Assuming that historical products or processes were optimal or efficient: Just because something has survived does not mean it was the best possible version of that thing. For example, an ancient pottery piece which has survived might not be the most technically perfect one and there were other better designs that failed in preservation over time Ignoring important innovations that failed: It is possible that some of the most important innovations in a particular field never made it to the present day because they were unsuccessful or didn't gain enough traction. By only looking at the products or processes that have survived, we can easily overlook these innovations and fail to understand the full range of ideas and experimentation that took place in the past. Failing to appreciate the role of luck in the survival of certain things: Sometimes, the survival of a particular product or process is simply a matter of luck. For example, a ship that sank in a calm sea and was quickly discovered by treasure hunters will be better preserved than one that sank in a stormy sea.”

https://www.quora.com/50-years-ago-it-seemed-like-things-were-made-better-quality-wise-Why?share=1

2