TDalton24
TDalton24 t1_j6g6zfq wrote
Reply to comment by vredditor in Ally bank account fears by vredditor
Yes don't do that. That would be more suspicious and while likely wouldn't get frozen cmwould be more likely
TDalton24 t1_ism86mk wrote
Reply to comment by IndyMLVC in OHSU scientists discover mechanism of hearing by TequillaShotz
Because you can't have it be the wild west as that can be bad for consumers sometimes. So the law actually granted the FDA 3 years to do it. Biden could have made his "statement" on Day 1 of his presidency if he felt like it. My guess is his timing is actually the right choice here as his team felt that everything was ready and in place. I dont give Trump any more credit here than Biden. I don't like either and would begrudgingly vote for Biden on a 2 person ballot. But I don't think this is something that's political. Technology is better and quite honestly the science is better that not enough people with mild to moderate hearing loss were using the old system so this is better even if people don't get as good a fit and usage but atleast will have them in higher numbers
TDalton24 t1_ism7c8e wrote
Reply to comment by IndyMLVC in OHSU scientists discover mechanism of hearing by TequillaShotz
Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act of 2017
Passed the House on July 12, 2017 (passed without objection)
Passed the Senate on August 3, 2017 (passed voice vote)
Signed into law by President Donald Trump on August 18, 2017
I am not pro Trump and quite honestly disgusted by him but Biden did not do this. Although to be fair I am sure he would have. It was bipartisan but you introduced as if Biden did something here and he didn't.
TDalton24 t1_ism6v18 wrote
Reply to comment by IndyMLVC in OHSU scientists discover mechanism of hearing by TequillaShotz
You mean congress did in 2017?
TDalton24 t1_j6g739m wrote
Reply to comment by SolutionLeading in Ally bank account fears by vredditor
You banned them from your wifi. Lighten up on them