TDaltonC

TDaltonC t1_j1vfkgs wrote

Reply to comment by icest0 in art future by nickmakr

That is exactly the kind of usability problem that is totally real, but also very manageable. It’s not trivial, but it’s on everyone list of things that will get better as the technology matures. People had the same kind of objections to computers and the internet. (I can’t believe I need to belabor this point in a sub about tech trends)

As for what I’m personally doing about this, I’m the cofounder of a company using blockchain to track beneficial ownership of climate assets. So I think that the arguments in favor of blockchain are very convincing.

−1

TDaltonC t1_j1v7vpe wrote

Reply to comment by icest0 in art future by nickmakr

If you were designing a public ownership registry from scratch today, what technology would you use for settlement and clearance if not blockchain? You a fan of graphite on tree pulp?

0

TDaltonC t1_j1v2d16 wrote

Reply to art future by nickmakr

ERC721/1155 (NFTs) is a smart contact technical specification. Asking about that might be the wrong question. Is the further of art ownership attribution digital? Yes. Is the future of digital ownership record keeping blockchain based? Yes.

1