That’s good, still a little bit of a bad taste for a good community but at least they backed off. I didn’t see much for any follow ups to the initial story but not really my channels. Thanks for the update

Doesn’t really inspire confidence after proceeding to be getting called under monetized, hopefully enough pushback they overhaul the draft

So I guess the proper question to ask is, would be the scenario I suggest be possible under that ToS?

I did note that it seemed to be quite vague, intentionally or even unintentionally

There’s some good YouTube videos of it but essentially they said it’s under monetized and put out an intentionally vague and very self serving change to the TOS that effectively lets them take and market any ideas as well as a share of profits from any related content (above an amount?).

The games long and large success seems widely attributed to the fact that the business model was so open and accepting to fan content and this current iteration appears to be the exact opposite.

That’s a non D&D players understanding of where things are at now, correct as needed

I bought some last year and was down, it dipped under $5 not too long ago and I bought a chunk which I sold when it went under $7

I think there’s decent profit potential picking it up below $5 but I think I would only want to hold long term on house money this damn thing is all over the place