Can we start calling them something that's less stupid and clickbaity then?

I read that in Robert Stack’s voice.

Bullshit. So does NATO. It's called mutually assured destruction. Russia is not in a strong position here, and it's weakness to worry about how they will warp or misrepresent what you say. They're going to do that no matter what. Russia having nukes is NOT a good reason to give a shit about Russia's own propaganda narratives, sorry. That's really kind of stupid.

It's nothing but cowardice at this point to give a shit about how Russia spins what you say. Why would you continue to cede them ground as if they have reasonable demands with any basis in reality? They don't.

That's not really the point though, the point is that their beliefs have no consistency. One minute they'll say God sent natural disasters, the next minute, the democrats are responsible for equally bad natural disasters.

Remember when we were young and naive enough that we thought we could argue about things based on their own supposed internal logical frameworks? Doesn't that seem quaint now?

Imagine having a persecution fetish so strong, it forced you to basically argue that Biden is more powerful than God.

If we just stop using thermometers, the number of ice storms will go down in no time. You'll see.

Thank Mr. Skeltal