If any one of you bozos had read the article you would realize that they are, in fact, trying to avoid a Skynet-type situation:
>maintain human control and involvement for all actions critical to informing and executing sovereign decisions concerning nuclear weapons employment.
​
>Kallenborn said it was also important that Washington included a call for human control over nuclear weapons “because when it comes to autonomous weapons risk, I think that is easily the highest risk you possibly have.”
So the headline is slightly misleading as this seems to be more of a "artificial intelligence military disuse initiative".
TeebZ t1_j8vsswp wrote
Reply to US launches artificial intelligence military use initiative by stepsinstereo
If any one of you bozos had read the article you would realize that they are, in fact, trying to avoid a Skynet-type situation:
>maintain human control and involvement for all actions critical to informing and executing sovereign decisions concerning nuclear weapons employment.
​
>Kallenborn said it was also important that Washington included a call for human control over nuclear weapons “because when it comes to autonomous weapons risk, I think that is easily the highest risk you possibly have.”
So the headline is slightly misleading as this seems to be more of a "artificial intelligence military disuse initiative".