I definitely agree that Federer and Nadal are the greatest of all time.
BUT with that being said I think there’s an argument to be made that Djokovic prime vs prime was just as good as both Nadal and Federer. Which he deserves credit for. Is that an unreasonable statement?
TheOnlyOneWhoKnows t1_j0zqemp wrote
Reply to comment by 3cit in Rafael Nadal hits 900 consecutive weeks (almost 18 years) in tennis top 10 by SoggyConclusion4674
I definitely agree that Federer and Nadal are the greatest of all time.
BUT with that being said I think there’s an argument to be made that Djokovic prime vs prime was just as good as both Nadal and Federer. Which he deserves credit for. Is that an unreasonable statement?