According to this article that was just released yesterday, the unrestricted model of GPT-4 can produce images.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712

On page 16, "the model appears to have a genuine ability for visual tasks, rather than just copying code from similar examples in the training data. The evidence below strongly supports this claim, and demonstrates that the model can handle visual concepts, despite its text-only training"

I'm still not sure whether my initial assumption was from information I gleaned somewhere or because I hallucinated it. Regardless, GPT-4 can indeed output images.

It appears humans like me are also prone to hallucinations - I genuinely think I must have dreamed that capability immediately after the dev showcase.

😹😹😹

I mean you can either use what’s publicly available and decide that’s what it’s capable of or watch the developer showcase and see what the model itself is capable of.

Yeah that’s a feature that GPT-4 is capable of.

Dude it’s lactose

Yup I have nothing to lose and everything to gain from this. Come at me, world changing AGI. i’m ready.

OK. So what makes Bing not appear to actually be conscious?

Now what if you fixed all of those issues? Now what’s preventing it from appearing actually conscious? Nothing? You can’t disprove it’s consciousness?

Well, if it looks like a zebra, eats like a zebra, sounds like a zebra, and acts like a zebra, it might be a zebra.

I’m extremely excited for this prospect the most - being able to turn works of literature, books or manga, into films and tv shows seamlessly. Even being able to turn them into scripts would tremendously aid the process.

Both examples you provided are very clearly not the same as AI or Internet aka transformative technologies.

You literally can’t limit “post-singularity” benefits to one thing. that’s like saying “cure to cancer”. sure, there may at one point be a singular cure to the thousands of diseases called “cancer”, but there’s still going to be individual cures that are immensely helpful. open source stable diffusion vs openAI Dall-E is a great current example of why you can’t possibly expect this technology to be limited somehow.

"For all we know once the Internet becomes powerful enough the elites will just use it to communicate with one another and only benefit themselves." - Some guy in 1994, probably.

My personal belief is that the future you imagine, if we were to put it into BC-AD terms, is at 0 AD, and we are at 40 BC.

That being said, it’s unfathomable where we’d be in 1000 years. I wonder if any of us will be able to live to see it.

It’s literally impossible to imagine what this technology will be like 500-1000 years.

You wouldn’t have been able to predict this 20 years ago, how could you know what’s going to happen in centuries? Let’s take it a decade at a time.

OP provided an example of why things are “changing too fast for us to keep up.”

You guys are literally saying the exact same thing. You just provided another example that goes along with his original point lol.

Regardless I agree with both of you, although it’s more of an objective fact than opinion.

“Don’t take it personally”? Aren’t you and OP saying the same things?

What? Who knows? I’d rather you provide a direct reason this is correlated to digital copies instead of posing a thought-provoking question, though.

Excited for either. I either live out my dystopian fantasies or utopian.

School isn’t only about education. It’s about fostering growth through learning and exposure.

u/apple_achia when they die and realize they are actually currently in one of these simulated realities, completely unaware and realize that what they hold so dear to be their true body never actually existed in the first place

I rolled my eyes while reading this

Have you seen the comment sections on some YouTube videos? 90% of them are incoherent garbage that’s probably bots worse than GPT-3

Redditor moment

Lol what.

You take human error over an AI able to analyze literally everything and formulate the perfect solution/response?