You know posting this just potentially helps someone avoid getting caught right?

Yes, but there were some questions around the quality of service being provided by the company. It was called PCC. They had a good backstory too, were made up of striking Verizon workers IIRC.

The results were that the survey was done wrong and capped answers after a day and not 7. And that the vote was relatively inconclusive with the majority of folks voting for some sort of crime thread. I’m just not sure why they can’t admit this happened and move on like they said they would.

So why are y’all still burying the crime thread results? Is it because the top mod doesn’t personally like the results of the vote, or want to admit they messed up running the vote? We were told 3+ months ago results would be released and acted on and you’re yet to publicly even admit (oh right you responded to one comment and got chewed out for misrepresenting the truth in it) that you need to redo the vote….. who cares about the actual thread at this point but leaderships inability to actually follow up with anything they claim they’ll do is embarrassing. That and the utter lack of accountability.

I’d bet this is the sorta guy that complains about others abusing the system too.

Thanks for understanding. Hope ya have a good one.

I’m not here for a big debate, just pointing out the verifiably false thing that the OP said.

Real answer, I don't think its worth us talking about this as I don't think you're interesting in actually having a discussion, and it's not worth my time. If you are actually curious there's plenty of studies on the subject that you can read.

God you're insufferable.

> Crime is not strongly related to poverty. Rich people commit crime too.

I mean, crime is incredibly related to poverty. Sure things like access to quality education or stable housing also help, but to say there isn't a strong relationship is ignoring a lot of studies and data on the subject.

Propaganda? What the duck are you talking about?? I don’t know if the attacker is black, I just know racist slurs were used. That usually signifies a hate crime.

Why are you so hell bent on making this anything but about about a story where a young black boy was bullied and beat up? Are you so averse to recognizing that black people can be victims of crimes that you have this weird visceral and racist reaction to this story? Says a shit ton about you.

What are you even talking about? Please seek help for your hateful opinions.

Man you’re so stupidly racist you see a black kid being attacked in a hate crime and have to try and make it about how bad you think black people are? Fuck outta here.

Used to get on the 2 train at New Lots and sleep til at least 42nd street….. I was not a smart man.

That’s stupid

I mean you’re right I could have worded the last line better, but can you forgive me for being peeved that you’d put words in my mouth that we’re way out of left field and mischaracterizing of anything I was saying? Especially considering my point boils down to we should treat tbi seriously.

I mean I’m all for folks recording police officers. They need to be accountable to the broader public and body cams and citizen bystanders are good ways to do that. But yeah people trying to treat all that like a joke and just film for clout aren’t helping anyone.

I’m sorry that happened to you. Nowhere did I say the criminal justice system is fair, you’re one of many people who doesn’t get justice or accountability in it.

That doesn’t change the fact that slamming someone’s head against the concrete to the point of knocking them out is a serious potential injury. It’s wrong when a private citizen or a cop does it and there should be repercussions for either if done with malice.

I think in using terms like “Angel police officers” you’re speaking to a strawman and not me anymore.

I think it’s more so just the way the internet works. It frequently uses anger or outrage as a driver so it brings together the most toxic and inauthentic parts of people and their opinions. I know I likely bring shitty parts of myself into discussions sometimes as well. People in the real world tend to be a lot more wide ranging and interesting than the way we all present online. And terminally online or relatively immature people tend to be so divorced from actual reality that you need to get in arguments that slamming the back of your head on concrete could result in a potentially life changing injury.

Like it or not people get hurt when their skull hits pavement. If you’re going to tussle on the street, know it means there’s possible massive repercussions to your actions.

I played rugby for four years with pretty reckless abandon to my body, even at my dumbest I never would have played on concrete.

Clearly you’ve never met anyone who has suffered a tbi and your head is used to weathering the storm of hitting concrete like it’s nothing I guess?

Traumatic brain injuries are no joke. Pretty clear the guy can’t even stand after his head hit the pavement. That’s at least a severe concussion and could be worse.

Ehhh doubtful in this instance. I bet this guy gets a couple years

I highly doubt that considering he pretty clearly severely injured a cop. NYPD usually doesn’t like that.