Well yeah because either way people will die.
If choosing to die over another person starving to death for example, it is that person starving that has to live through the pain.

Its like choosing to die slowly or quickly.

Its usually critical thinking that solves moral problems.

Like so:
To address the subject of morals we must consider the broader spectrum of which it covers.
The end goal is to live in a way that is rational, as such it must be considered for all life because life lives.
With consideration to unbiased critical thinking we must challenge our own cultures which influence assumptions and biases, because such man-made constructs have no meaning to living things other than humans.
As such you must consider what it is that influences unethical behaviour in our decision making so that we may avoid it.

Unbiasedly we must strive for an unbiased ethical approach to morals because the study of such a subject requires critical thinking.
To simplify the goal: You can't value a social construct or object over the lives or wellbeings of others.