TituspulloXIII

TituspulloXIII t1_je5ru1k wrote

There are multiple places in your account you can see your usage, rather than pull up a bill, bring up one of those charts in your account?

like /u/zgrizz stated, I've never had a problem looking at my account/pulling a bill off the website. Do you have some kind of pop-up blocker that may be preventing the pdf of the bill from downloading?

1

TituspulloXIII t1_je0izzq wrote

If that's your experience with the cheap wooden ones.

Just grab a couple of these and give them a shot. Walk into any home improvement store and they likely have them and they are only like $6.

It's a very clean kill, I've never had to worry about cleaning up blood or guts from the floor.

1

TituspulloXIII t1_je09vpl wrote

You can reuse traps you know.

Unless you are somehow killing hundreds of mice, how are you going through a big box?

I live in the woods too and just use these:

https://www.homedepot.com/p/TOMCAT-Press-N-Set-Mouse-Trap-0360710PM/205563821

They say disposable, but they can easily be reset. Each trap has killed dozens of mice.

2

TituspulloXIII t1_j5yr7bd wrote

Aluminum is the best, plastic containers need to go away and just use cans. Easy to recycle. If i buy something, I try my best to buy it out of an aluminum can if at all.

As far as cardboard/paper goes. I heat the house with wood. All Cardboard/paper just gets thrown into the stove (save it in the basement during the summer)

2

TituspulloXIII t1_j20sxly wrote

Also, as far as garbage pickup, was there not a private company that could be contracted out for that area?

Back when i lived in Marlborough, the town didn't have trash/recycling either. But there was a private company that would do it (i just brought my stuff to the transfer station)

1

TituspulloXIII t1_j1zkokj wrote

If people cared about recycling there wouldn't be shit all of the side of the road. At least with a deposit it means, at the very least, cans are picked up off the road and returned.

I just wish they'd make it a deposit on nips instead of a flat tax. That's the current plague of trash all over roadways.

If you don't want the state to collect your revenue, just donate the cans. Just look around you probably have boy scouts, school sports, an animal shelter, something that is running a can drive trying to raise money.

2

TituspulloXIII t1_j1zgb6e wrote

Don't know what part of the state you're in. But I would save my cans until I had a bunch then go to an actual redemption center. Dump them in a counter and be out in like 5 min.

Don't bother with going to a grocery store or whatever where you have to hand feed the cans

10

TituspulloXIII t1_ixeoqo2 wrote

> I am completely against nationalizing/government takeover of utilities, BUT if Eversource is not generating any electrcity, why should we be hostage to their rates? Eversource, as the gas and water company, are laying miles of new supply lines which are very costly, and would account for the "delivery" aspects of our bills. > > These are outrageous rates, and unfortunately we are powerless to do anything about it as our corrupt politicians are in their pockets. Fuck Eversource.

0% of this rate increase is going to Eversource, as the other poster that responded to you mentioned. This increase is 100% on the supply side.

1

TituspulloXIII t1_ixenieu wrote

It is in fact true.

As far as Constellation (that's the name you're forgetting) they might be losing money on this 13 cents per KWh for the next few months, but they also have you in at a 3 year contract, perhaps down the line they will turn a profit.

Constellation might also have a cheaper way to produce power (i believe they are based out of texas, so they could be getting higher priority on the pipeline)

1

TituspulloXIII t1_iuji43t wrote

Wow, I was giving you the benefit of doubt that you were talking about particulates, not CO2.

Wood, and I was originally speaking of wood stoves, (although pellets are still better than coal) is CO2 neutral. Trees grow, die, decompose, new trees grow.

Where fossil fuels are carbon emitters, so sure if you only measure the burn, and ignore everything in the supply chain, wood is worse, but you have to ignore everything prior it getting to your house.

It won't be large scale, as people in dense suburbs and cities won't be burning wood, but rural people and less dense suburbs can be part of the solution.

Anybody that lives "in the woods" on about 1.5 acres or more will likely have enough dead trees to heat thier house for years.

That and power companies and other home owners take down dead/dying trees and either leave it to rot or someone can go grab it for free.

5