TizonaBlu

TizonaBlu t1_jaxe462 wrote

Reply to comment by jakeuznslao in NYC murders, shootings and subway crime dropped in February, continuing the downward trend: NYPD by Darrkman

> Nyc is one of the safest cities in the world.

In AMERICA. AMERICA. I think New Yorkers like to tout the safest city in the US stat, but now inflate it to the world.

NYC is highly dangerous compared to any other major city in a developed country.

Like I literally can walk around in Taipei, in any neighborhood, and I will not be robbed, have my stuff stolen, beat up, or be victim of a violent crime, or any crime period.

26

TizonaBlu t1_j8utlbo wrote

Reply to comment by LongIsland1995 in 24 Middagh Street, Brooklyn Heights, New York. (1925 vs. today) by libananahammock

I don’t know the percentage, but a large amount of townhouses were converted to multi family rentals from 60s onwards, so that owners could collect rent. Often times configured as an owners unit and multiple rentals.

That’s also when many stoops were removed in favor of ground level entrance.

However, in the last 20-25 years, it’s been going the opposite direction, and multi families have been converted to single family.

Townhouses are really rare and coveted.

2

TizonaBlu t1_j7pubc2 wrote

Reply to comment by JesseRKnight in "Even a $7,000 Rent Doesn’t Guarantee Dogs Get to Walk Through the Lobby" In some New York City buildings, the four-legged pets are not welcome everywhere. Their owners must carry them or use a service elevator. by CactusBoyScout

If a rule is so bad that a significant percentage of the residents do not follow it, then I would say that the rule shouldn't have been in place anyway.

Also, you must be fun during the civil rights era.

1

TizonaBlu t1_j7bcogq wrote

Reply to comment by SRL5 in "Even a $7,000 Rent Doesn’t Guarantee Dogs Get to Walk Through the Lobby" In some New York City buildings, the four-legged pets are not welcome everywhere. Their owners must carry them or use a service elevator. by CactusBoyScout

I’ve only lived in condos, but I know that coops generally have way stricter rules. I do know of condos that only allow service staff to use service elevator though, it really depends on the board.

However, asking owners to use service with dogs is not that common, at least among new buildings. As almost all new buildings are dogs friendly, it’s until the actually board forms that they might modify the rules.

2

TizonaBlu t1_j7bbmxq wrote

Reply to comment by GenshinKenshin in "Even a $7,000 Rent Doesn’t Guarantee Dogs Get to Walk Through the Lobby" In some New York City buildings, the four-legged pets are not welcome everywhere. Their owners must carry them or use a service elevator. by CactusBoyScout

Except that’s not true for the vast majority of high end condos in the city. I’m talking stuff like One57 or any number of Stern buildings.

Maybe that’s the case for coops as I’m not familiar with them.

0

TizonaBlu t1_j7bbgc7 wrote

Reply to comment by sportsfan42069 in "Even a $7,000 Rent Doesn’t Guarantee Dogs Get to Walk Through the Lobby" In some New York City buildings, the four-legged pets are not welcome everywhere. Their owners must carry them or use a service elevator. by CactusBoyScout

The person isn’t correct whatsoever. I’ve literally lived in, been to, or looked at, the most expensive buildings in NYC. This isn’t a thing, or at least not a common thing.

1

TizonaBlu t1_j7bbbiu wrote

Reply to comment by jallallabad in "Even a $7,000 Rent Doesn’t Guarantee Dogs Get to Walk Through the Lobby" In some New York City buildings, the four-legged pets are not welcome everywhere. Their owners must carry them or use a service elevator. by CactusBoyScout

Not true whatsoever. I’ve lived in a bunch of luxury buildings, visited a ton, and also house hunted in multiple buildings. That’s from 56 Leonard, to One57, to 432, to Jardam. Only letting dogs be in service is not a common thing whatsoever.

1