Tofu_Bo

Tofu_Bo t1_ivkmoql wrote

I generally support them, but this particular amendment has coterminous terms for the three top offices, which would have the three highest officials simultaneously running for re-election.

If they created an amendment that staggered them or had different lengths of terms, sure, but this one just seems primed for officials checking out to campaign every other term while still on the job. There is an amendment out there I'd support, but it's not this one.

2