Tokenvoice
Tokenvoice t1_j9933re wrote
Reply to comment by I_might_be_weasel in Naval Academy Renames Building After Jimmy Carter by langis_on
Had to come into the comments to check if he had died or not. There sure are enough Jimmy Carter posts on today to suggest he has.
Tokenvoice t1_j6ons95 wrote
Reply to comment by oldadapter in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
No because you read brail, you don’t say I felt a good book the other day. But here’s the fun part you would assume that a blind person who said they read a book would mean it was in brail and not that they listened to an audiobook, which reinforces the point that listening to an audiobook isn’t the same as reading contextually.
And to reiterate my original point because we have moved a wee ways down in the conversation and I don’t want to be mistaken, it doesn’t matter so much how you consumed the book they are all valid for a conversation on the book.
Tokenvoice t1_j6lh5pq wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_YOURPRIVATEKEY in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
No I don’t, my mate listens to audiobooks, I read yet quite often he will use the terms he has read. In a conversation it doesn’t matter if you’re replying, does a bit if you’re starting it which you would say hey I have been listening to this book, have you read it.
Though I would say sometimes the distinction is important because you want to talk about a specific facet of either media. Like the illustrations and maps in the book, or the way the person narrating the book pronounces names.
Tokenvoice t1_j6lgd8h wrote
Reply to comment by twirlingpink in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
I am unsure what you’re trying to say, are you implying that to consume books in a text based media that we need to have an entomology degree so that we can know the meaning of words?
Or are you saying that words don’t matter? Because that is rather wrong. Words have nuance to them. Landing safely and falling safely both have a common meaning of you made it to the ground unharmed. Yet to land safely means that you were in control, that you were in some way to control your decent. As were fell safely means you had no control. One implies skill the other luck.
You are correct that language evolves, for example the change of the use of the word present to next, but to use that argument to say that two things are the same is an odd thing to do. Notice how I used the word consume instead of reading or listening, the evolution would be to use that, not to say that reading a book is to listen to it.
Tokenvoice t1_j6le1t0 wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_YOURPRIVATEKEY in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
You missed the part how I said it doesn’t matter how you consumed it it seems because you came in very hot with arguing my point that you agree with. It doesn’t matter how you consumed the story just that you did.
Words matter otherwise we would be watching movies instead of reading or listening to stories. Its the difference between he landed safely and he fell safely. Shouting vs bellowing, laughing vs giggling vs chortling.
Tokenvoice t1_j6kuwgc wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_YOURPRIVATEKEY in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
See that’s wrong, you didn’t read it, you listened to it. Now is one method superior to the other, not especially, though most people I know listen while doing something else compared to exclusively reading. But you both got the story and can talk as equals.
In some cases I would even argue that you have to consume the book one way and then consume it the other the second time.
I read the Dresden files first but my mate listened to them. So on my second time round I listened to them while driving and thoroughly enjoyed it. With Dresden Files the audiobooks have became such a part of why they got big as well as creating the world, I mean James Masters has became the voice of Dresden and added to my experience.
But to say that you consumed media one way when you did another is factually wrong, and if you say you read it I will ask what edition of book did you get.
Tokenvoice t1_j1kb5sj wrote
Reply to comment by erinraspberry in Texas coach Chris Beard's fiancee says he didn't strangle her. by PrincessBananas85
Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu
Tokenvoice t1_j1k9re2 wrote
Reply to comment by CoweringCowboy in Texas coach Chris Beard's fiancee says he didn't strangle her. by PrincessBananas85
Its interesting that you have been downvoted. Because everyone is saying that her claim that she was abused should be believed, which you agreed with. Then you go on to say that when they retract the allegation they shouldn’t be believed because they are liars.
Which makes sense because either the accusation or the retraction is a lie, so both should be looked into. If the accusation is a lie then she tried to ruin a man, if the retraction is the lie then he should be put up on charges.
Now I could be putting words in your mouth through a false sense of wanting to think the best of people, but what you say as a stand alone comment is logical. Or you’re being a douche and hating on women for a joke but I don’t want to believe that one.
Tokenvoice t1_ixpmili wrote
Reply to comment by itty53 in A Trejo Thanksgiving. by DinoRoman
Sorry to tell you Itty, but your mum has moved on, she has a new family now, she is now a Trejo. Please don’t make this awkward and just let her go.
Tokenvoice t1_isdjdf4 wrote
Reply to comment by greyyakdad in Man plays his saxophone through 9-hour, "very, very complex" brain surgery to remove tumor by BitterFuture
Nah we’re hoping it was epic sax man.
Tokenvoice t1_je93q1l wrote
Reply to comment by Evernight2021 in TIL Margaret Knight (1838-1914) invented a machine to mass produce flat-bottomed paper bags and, after winning a lawsuit against a fraudster who copied her design, the patent was issued in 1871. Her first invention was when she was 12 years old (and began working in a factory). She had 87 patents. by WonderWmn212
Ofcourse you dont have any patents, they designed all of the good stuff and now we’re left holding the flat bottom bags of scraping the bottom of the barrel.