TommyCollins
TommyCollins t1_izp3bjr wrote
Reply to comment by n0ttomuch in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
At least click the link and read it thoughtfully before reflexively commenting
TommyCollins t1_izp3231 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
Bro 90%? I’ll literally film & eat my old leather wingtips if some study is done which shows even 10% of COVID vaccines “skeptics” don’t hold at least 3 other counter factual and incompatible beliefs.
TommyCollins t1_izp2kbm wrote
Reply to comment by TheDownvotesFarmer in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
I thought it was a joke that got out of hand. Tangentially, r/birdsarentreal will have the same trajectory I am calling it here
TommyCollins t1_izseipg wrote
Reply to comment by DivideEtImpala in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
Tbh I wasn’t really prepared to eat my wingtips so I hedged my bet & hoped it would fly