TopicRepulsive7936
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_isyjqv0 wrote
Reply to Since Humans Need Not Apply video there has not much been videos which supports CGP Grey's claim by RavenWolf1
What we got to remember is that the economy is incredibly artificial, work for work's sake. So things might look a lot like they do now, workers slowly losing their leverage, until the transformation of everything.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_isv81k8 wrote
Reply to comment by hvgotcodes in Rolls-Royce says a combination of quantum compputing and classical computing is likely to be in use for at least a decade before pure quantum takes over. The company is working with Classiq to create hybrid algorithms to speed up simulations for fluid dynamics and new materials. by upyourego
"...to speed up simulations for fluid dynamics and new materials."
Are you willing to admit the clickbait was in your head and you should read the whole title?
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ispx3m4 wrote
Reply to comment by powerscunner in Is this imagination? by Background-Loan681
On some threads everyone catastrophically forgets that capable large language models exist.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_isgfh9q wrote
Reply to comment by chimgchomg in [OFF TOPIC] Are there any studies proposing solutions to the problem of low birth rates? by FusionRocketsPlease
Why can't we exploit the poor right where they are?
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_is6d7q6 wrote
Reply to comment by mealoftheday42 in How long have you been on the Singularity subreddit? by TheHamsterSandwich
I think people tend to vastly underestimate what we're capable of in terms of computing infrastructure. In the 1930's AI was done on pen and paper (Turing's chess engine) and in the early 1990's supercomputers were still a single cabinet systems. We're far removed from those times but there's also room to grow. Then there are those who have kneejerk opposition of us utilizing our planetary resources for AI, they are entitled to their opinion but I don't think it does any good to listen to those types of people.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irognus wrote
Reply to Have we reached a technological plateau? by CleaverIam
Oh jebus are we going to see these posts again. People who don't care about tech at all coming here knowing everything.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irifok4 wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
Define google.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iridvf0 wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
Define all of those words you used I can't understand anything you said.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irgsogq wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
Explain. How many definitions have you come across.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irgl3aw wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
AGI is has one (1) exact definition. Sorry.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irdg707 wrote
Reply to comment by ginger_gcups in How concerned are you that global conflict will prevent the singularity from happening? by DreaminDemon177
The whole thing is bullshit anyway. Conflict is negative sum game.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ircwx8i wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in How concerned are you that global conflict will prevent the singularity from happening? by DreaminDemon177
Bless your heart.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irctcwo wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in How concerned are you that global conflict will prevent the singularity from happening? by DreaminDemon177
Well ok you stringed couple of concepts together but didn't arrive to a coherent thought.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ircewcr wrote
Reply to comment by CraftArchitect in We are in the midst of the biggest technological revolution in history and people have no idea by DriftingKing
The billionaires will kill each other and then my chance comes.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irceagv wrote
Reply to comment by adamxi in We are in the midst of the biggest technological revolution in history and people have no idea by DriftingKing
Very informative and thoughtful.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irbg0cz wrote
Reply to We are in the midst of the biggest technological revolution in history and people have no idea by DriftingKing
In evolution all the interesting stuff happened in the last 0.25% of its timeline. But evolution had constant resources. The computing resources have been doubling almost every month if we add together hardware and software improvements.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ir8ftle wrote
Yeah you got told but was too arrogant to listen.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ir38way wrote
Reply to comment by hyphnos13 in What happens in the first month of AGI/ASI? by kmtrp
You are assuming a lot about the state of manufacturing when general intelligence is achieved. Did you know general intelligence is most likely developed some time in the future?
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ir36z46 wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in What happens in the first month of AGI/ASI? by kmtrp
You could be Satan. Or Santa.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ir35ivh wrote
Reply to comment by OtterPop16 in What happens in the first month of AGI/ASI? by kmtrp
No sarcasm?
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iqvtnd6 wrote
Sounds good. I'm sure these people are working hard to figure new things out.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iqoc6so wrote
Reply to Serious question: Why does so many want to fix aging? Without radically changing the economy, this basically makes you into a slave that can never retire or die from age. by [deleted]
Your fatalism has destroyed your brain.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_itdbbp2 wrote
Reply to comment by iNstein in Could AGI stop climate change? by Weeb_Geek_7779
The definition of artificial general intelligence puts no limit to its capabilities. Thus super and general intelligence are redundant when used together.