TopicRepulsive7936
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixehsbd wrote
Reply to comment by vernes1978 in Would like to say that this subreddit's attitude towards progress is admirable and makes this sub better than most other future related discussion hubs by Foundation12a
Attempts at trying to build a house in the traditional way have failed for millenia.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixdi33k wrote
Reply to comment by vernes1978 in Would like to say that this subreddit's attitude towards progress is admirable and makes this sub better than most other future related discussion hubs by Foundation12a
I'm just being pragmatic.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixb8lev wrote
Reply to comment by Key_Asparagus_919 in should this subreddit become explicitly anti- techno-pessimism? by [deleted]
Real doomers don't watch movies.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixb8h1o wrote
Reply to comment by QuietOil9491 in should this subreddit become explicitly anti- techno-pessimism? by [deleted]
Yeah let's talk about the fucking heat death of the universe or something equally important.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixb81tr wrote
Reply to comment by thehourglasses in should this subreddit become explicitly anti- techno-pessimism? by [deleted]
The same old demoralization is just mind numbing, brain rotting.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixb7kqg wrote
Reply to comment by Chispy in should this subreddit become explicitly anti- techno-pessimism? by [deleted]
Most of all it would be a unique experience ie not the same shit that is on every fucking page on the internet.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixb5u4i wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in should this subreddit become explicitly anti- techno-pessimism? by [deleted]
Kurzweil's wager: By trusting tech, what you have to lose?
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixao8qa wrote
Reply to comment by vernes1978 in Would like to say that this subreddit's attitude towards progress is admirable and makes this sub better than most other future related discussion hubs by Foundation12a
As time goes on the probability for it approaches 100%.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ix97zkr wrote
Reply to comment by nblack88 in Would like to say that this subreddit's attitude towards progress is admirable and makes this sub better than most other future related discussion hubs by Foundation12a
We don't always have to hear all the possible humanity killers listed. It can be skipped once in a while.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ix349lr wrote
Reply to comment by Quealdlor in The time it took to get to the moon. by Redvolition
Amount of computation and economy might correlate linearly at some point. Double the computation and double the economy, or something like that.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ix0acqb wrote
Reply to comment by modestLife1 in 2023 predictions by ryusan8989
Wouldn't be terribly surprised but would be shocked like everyone else.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ix08pz5 wrote
Reply to comment by Kolinnor in Why Meta’s latest large language model survived only three days online by nick7566
Maybe it's nothing. But for decades he was a small time psychology professor until he bursted into the AI scene and like many he assumed he knew the business. Maybe he just likes attention, bit insecure. But you never know if he gets extra money from somewhere.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwwdd1u wrote
Reply to comment by Kolinnor in Why Meta’s latest large language model survived only three days online by nick7566
Somebody should research his background a little. Why is he so determined and why is he everywhere.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwve325 wrote
Reply to comment by ihateshadylandlords in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
You can block me, I ain't an expert on reddit features.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwvbp63 wrote
Reply to comment by ihateshadylandlords in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
Come on man.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwv7asm wrote
Reply to comment by ihateshadylandlords in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
Let's see if your passive aggressiveness is ever cured.
!RemindMe 5 million years
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwpqdw1 wrote
Reply to comment by YaAbsolyutnoNikto in To save the world or to shape a better world, what is the most critical action to take? by Born-Worth-5611
But we have to do without.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwjjn3v wrote
Reply to comment by tiberius-Erasmus in A typical thought process by Kaarssteun
Because it results in human suffering. Not only are there more people born, the high fertility indicates they are born into abject poverty. Life sucks as is but it sucks some more in absolute poverty. The baby dying of hunger today doesn't care about your tech or politic jargon.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwjhstg wrote
Reply to comment by overlordpotatoe in A typical thought process by Kaarssteun
Kids take a lot of resources to raise. For a couple decades we've had a surplus of working age compared to children, this logically should have caused a boom but no news relating to such.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwi9aqn wrote
Reply to comment by TheSingulatarian in The Class Struggle of Longevity by Mynameis__--__
I know some history. I just wonder whether the reason you are this fatalistic is because that is what you yourself fundamentally are.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwfm0d4 wrote
Reply to comment by TheSingulatarian in The Class Struggle of Longevity by Mynameis__--__
I wonder how much of that is actually your thinking.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwccobf wrote
Reply to comment by Devanismyname in Cultural Profile of r/singularity by Redvolition
So legalize drugs and that's about it.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwcc5ho wrote
Reply to comment by Cult_of_Chad in Cultural Profile of r/singularity by Redvolition
Probably because there's no answer as to why in that Lovecraftian scheme.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iwcat92 wrote
Reply to Cultural Profile of r/singularity by Redvolition
People come and go on here.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_ixj7osm wrote
Reply to comment by TheHamsterSandwich in Lex Fridman's father is pro-immortality by SpiritedSort672
And I don't think Fridman junior is even that young.