I feel the same. A good story with clever writing/directing can be told in 90 minutes, i don't want to dedicate half of my day to a movie. That being said, there is many very good movies that are 2+ hours, and i feel that they need to be that long for full impact... but i don't like to sit for that long, i'm with you in this.

Not divine sure, that wasn't my point. But this article at least made it sound like they plan to destroy it just because it's made by Hitler. First we should look at the art itself and then we can talk about whether if it's worth preserving or not.

But just because it's made by a controversial artist it shouldn't be destroyed. Even if it portrays hatred or racism, it can be examined and learned from. But ofc i'm not trying to pretend to be someone educated enough to debate this properly, but yeah, the debate about this is definitely a good thing. But destroying them - especially the audience voting on it - is just unnecessary and completely misses the point.

The debate is perfectly fine, i would listen to it. But why destroy the art though (or just why even have the opportunity to)? What message does that send? Guess what the nazis did with the art pieces they didn't like....