UnkindPotato

UnkindPotato t1_jbyz9r6 wrote

You're not gonna get pickups with confederate flags chasing you down screaming the n-slur.... but Seattle is pretty self-segregated. Black areas, white areas, asian areas.... not even a racial thing either, they don't call Capitol Hill "gaytown" for no reason

3

UnkindPotato t1_j4qqota wrote

I'll be voting "NO"

Everyone forgets that back in the day, nobody agreed with the .08 de facto limit, because de facto intoxication laws arwn't based in science. Nobody wanted these laws on the books because they invite corruption and give the police a reason to arrest and persecute people who aren't actually intoxicated.

The feds had to blackmail the states with federal highway funding in order to get the .08 limit passed. It worked.

I don't vote "YES" on laws that aren't supported by evidence. We don't need a hard alcohol limit, we need a set of objective measures of performance supported by science, unlike most current FSTs (with the exception of HGN) to determine intoxication

10

UnkindPotato t1_iruodwj wrote

The lack of tiktok on this list is concerning

Remember when some govt agency said tiktok was spyware and then it was shown that the vast majority of the app's code is bloat tracking malware and most people seemes onboard with making thw app illegal... and then nothing ever came of it?

I mean, facebook made the list. The lack of awareness is concerning

8