Veedrac
Veedrac t1_j7bomwl wrote
Reply to [N] "I got access to Google LaMDA, the Chatbot that was so realistic that one Google engineer thought it was conscious. First impressions" by That_Violinist_18
I was expecting little and received less.
Having to ask in the context of a conversation about dogs is not a meaningful impediment to interesting inquiry of model quality if you are smart about it.
Veedrac t1_iw837xo wrote
Reply to comment by lughnasadh in The CEO of OpenAI had dropped hints that GPT-4, due in a few months, is such an upgrade from GPT-3 that it may seem to have passed The Turing Test by lughnasadh
> The Winograd Schema Challenge is regarded as a much better test of true intelligence.
Good lord no! Read the paper! The Turing Test is not obsolete, you (and seemingly 99% of the population) just don't know what it is.
Veedrac t1_irbdxgp wrote
Reply to comment by canyonkeeper in [R] Google announces Imagen Video, a model that generates videos from text by Erosis
It blows my mind that this sub has basically become ML Flat Earth. There's no legitimate way people here actually think this research can't or won't replicate. “Oh but I can't personally put my foot on the moon play with this exact model exactly today” is such a fake argument.
Veedrac t1_j9tnubd wrote
Reply to comment by arg_max in [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
Ah, yes, those well-understood equations for aesthetic beauty from the 1970s.