It's a question to which the answer will be found in game theory and adjacent realms, but this really only matters in particular environments

Good lad

Why not open source

Maybe they have other types of PEDs that are relevant to their games and or disabilities

Thoughts on performance enhancing drugs? Any hot takes?

In any case it's interesting to begin baselining this technology and building up, if just to see what it can do

He's prioritizing a very well aligned incentive structure. Even if just in principle by talking about it. Meta guarantees a business model that works against your interests as a consumer.

Twitter is like going to the human zoo, you study the animals

You're referring to humans right?

Definitely not what he asked

Just like human redditors

We seem to be experiencing a moment in time where being critical is being somewhat overly rewarded socially, as opposed to building things.

This is a trash quality article. There is nothing in it besides stating the obvious that it wasn't a good product, and a bunch of naive, almost satirical comments from a supposed expert.

https://opt.alpa.ai/#generation

Courtesy of Meta.

You should read the original paper, it's quite accessible.

It's proposing a conceptual framework and approach to testing, not really defining "the definitive turing test".

Not sure what you mean by the second paragraph?

How about layering this on top of some kind of structure that harnesses the tides?

It has a more surgical approach to connecting users to content, then, say, Reddit. That's mostly what it has going for it.

Clearly this seems to be the accepted narrative, but could you provide examples for this so called bullying that affects the ability of researchers in the AI space to communicate their ideas on Twitter?