Wiseduck5
Wiseduck5 t1_ivdtbtt wrote
Reply to comment by SneakyLocke in Attorney General Bonta Calls on Social Media Companies to Stop the Spread of Disinformation Ahead of 2022 Midterm Elections by Wagamaga
Yes, because I expected you call any other news source "fake news."
Yet you still believed the ridiculous lie.
Wiseduck5 t1_ivcr15w wrote
Reply to comment by SneakyLocke in Attorney General Bonta Calls on Social Media Companies to Stop the Spread of Disinformation Ahead of 2022 Midterm Elections by Wagamaga
Are not even a little bit concerned that everything conservative media has been telling you is a lie? Did you also believe the nonsense about litter boxes?
Republicans quite literally have no platform. This is all they have.
And apparently that is enough. We're doomed as a species.
Wiseduck5 t1_ivcl83f wrote
Reply to comment by SneakyLocke in Attorney General Bonta Calls on Social Media Companies to Stop the Spread of Disinformation Ahead of 2022 Midterm Elections by Wagamaga
>If the narrative changed, that is fine.
Given that conservatives are still lying about it, no it is not fine.
>Ok, what about Kavanaugh? Any change there?
[The suicidal guy who called the cops on himself?] (https://www.businessinsider.com/man-with-gun-at-brett-kavanaughs-home-called-cops-on-himself-court-docs-2022-6)
If conservative didn't lie, they'd have nothing to say.
Wiseduck5 t1_ivcffd5 wrote
Reply to comment by SneakyLocke in Attorney General Bonta Calls on Social Media Companies to Stop the Spread of Disinformation Ahead of 2022 Midterm Elections by Wagamaga
You should probably go google that instead of making snarky comments.
[Because that's an outright lie.] (https://www.foxnews.com/us/north-dakota-police-say-evidence-suggesting-death-cayler-ellingson-involved-politics)
Thanks for providing such a clear cut example of misinformation.
Wiseduck5 t1_ixfp8qj wrote
Reply to comment by Agent_Angelo_Pappas in Associated Press reporter fired over erroneous story on Russian attack by Moynamama
>For anonymous sources they can’t really ask who the source is without compromising anonymity,
Incorrect. Editors normally know the identity of the anonymous sources.