Wx_Justin

Wx_Justin t1_j4xzps6 wrote

I'm surprised you don't like Trattoria! My girlfriend grew up around Italian-owned pizza shops and said it's the closest she's had to that quality. It's the best I've had around here too, with HomeSlyce second.

7

Wx_Justin t1_j3gxysn wrote

  1. I always look at the crime reports. At the end of the day, violent crime decreased quite significantly under Ball. You can "stand by" your comments about crime, but you can also accept that you were spreading misinformation about the WalletHub report. It's ironic considering you claim to "do your own research".

  2. You must have missed the incendiary comments the last time redistricting was a topic of discussion. There were many racist comments made: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/10/racists-in-one-of-americas-richest-counties-are-freaking-out-over-a-forced-busing-proposal/ Like I mentioned before, many of those that promote neighborhood schools have 2 or 3 schools that are equidistant from their place of residence. They often gravitate towards one that is actually further away from the closest school due to preference of school "reputation", or they prefer the legacy school. "Pay to play" is a disgusting practice as well, but many that promote neighborhood schools are essentially doing just this: their voices become loudest as they continuously complain about how such redistricting will impact their property values. Fussing over the BOE is funny considering you've promoted Carroll County schools in the past (which has far-right members that are for banning books). At the end of the day, HoCo has FAR better schools than Carroll or Anne Arundel and consistently ranks at the top at the state level and near the top in the country.

We need more progressive county leaders like Walsh and Jung and fewer Neoliberals and Republicans (Yungmann) that cater to developers and the rich.

3

Wx_Justin t1_j3fldgw wrote

"Please do your own research", but completely misunderstood the safest city survey. Less than 5 points out of 100 are COVID related. 30 points out of 100 are natural disaster related (and we are more prone to flooding/hurricanes/tornados than many other regions, so we must have scored pretty damn well in terms of home/financial safety).

Sure, development definitely needs to be slowed, but Kittleman wouldn't have done a damn thing about it (only Liz Walsh and Deb Jung actually care).

Redistricting is also necessary when done correctly. A lot of the complaints come from those who want their child to go to a specific school when there are one or two others that are closer.

2

Wx_Justin t1_izsviaq wrote

The owners at the dog parks are the worst. They sit there and pretend nothing is happening when their dog is harassing other dogs, and then they have the audacity to tell you to leave when the other dog has had enough

5

Wx_Justin t1_izrdytl wrote

Most people drive into DC or Baltimore for work, so rush hour can be a pain. I believe the interstate 95 corridor in MD/VA has the second worst traffic in the nation, right behind Los Angeles. The average commute time is about 40 minutes or so, based on the last report I saw.

Columbia is a great place to be, though. Nearly equidistant to Baltimore and DC if you want to get out and explore as well.

20

Wx_Justin t1_ixwf8go wrote

I see where you're coming from. Relative to single family zoning, low income housing is more environmentally friendly. But clearing dense vegetation areas rather than building on previously developed land isn't the way to go about it. In addition, we need to ensure that we aren't introducing too much impervious surface -- or at least offsetting it through planting more vegetation/constructing pervious surface and introducing flood mitigation measures

9

Wx_Justin t1_ixulxpu wrote

Columbia is likely the bluest area in a blue county. With that being said, there are 3 types of Dems in the area: NIMBY Dems who are politically moderate, hate low income housing, and are in-line with Republicans at the redistricting level; Democrats who are open to the construction of low income housing no matter the environmental cost; and progressive Dems who are for low income housing only if it is sustainability built. Of course this is more simplistic than reality, but it is likely the main point of political discussion at the moment.

There are establishment-preferring residents on both sides of the aisle that are all for overdevelopment while not taking into account the environmental costs.

Even the local Facebook groups for the county are "separated" by political ideology despite not appearing to be separated at the surface level.

22