Your other questions are irrelevant since they aren’t about literal chains. You’ve just missed the point, it’s a little obtuse but you’re fine unless you keep going now

Of course I am talking about literal chains. That was explicit from the beginning.

I suspect there is a misunderstanding taking place if you find my point (to review, my point is that people wearing chains notice that they are wearing chains) counterintuitive. I would be happy to elaborate further about my point if you can be a bit more specific about what our disagreement here is.

This one apparently. Anybody who thinks sitting still makes them unnoticeable, of any gender or era, has never worn chains.

Rosa has never been in chains I’ll tell you that for damn sure