That sounded suspiciously like chat GPT

But isn't this a pattern that's often repeated? When a technology is new, often the initial frontrunners get overrun when the next generation of that tech comes from someone else.

So, any of them?

In america, Christianity has nothing to do with the bible, or what Jesus said, or what Jesus is purported to have done or been like. It's about grifting the masses into paying unbelieving religious "leaders" significant amounts of money, continuously, to avoid some kind of damnation and hellfire, promised by that "leader."

By and large, it's a highly unethical, unspiritual, non-religious, completely capitalistic, borderline criminal (when it's not actually criminal) activity.

Oh, come on. It's not like there hasn't been literally 2000 years of continuous history of every Christian faction hating every other Christian faction. It's just a cult war.

And if you expand that to every Abrahamic religion, oh boy.

Better yet, give it back to the Seminole tribe.

Life is about serving Odin.

I read "joint play" and immediately wondered what kind of BDSM that is.

I don't think that came across the way you think it did.

This is the epitome of strawman. You present the situation which doesn't actually exist, and then go off on all the consequences as if they do.

Well, it doesn't prevent cancer. It can reduce the risk of certain types of cancer. There's a huge divide between prevents and reduces.

Russia is busy pulling an Elon.

Edit the original comment?

Use the old clothes as fuel to replicate new ones.

There are collections of old radio shows (mystery, adventure, scifi) in YouTube that I use for this. I like them because many have just black screens, and there's nothing tempting to watch.

Fair enough.

And another false statement as an assumption, which makes everything that follows it invalid, again. You're not actually good at this, but you are wordy.

Owning guns doesn't mean they are carried. Very few of the guns owned are actually being carried around . And if you want some evidence of that, look at the number of guns owned in america, versus the number of people.

I didn't see anything here that said they were killed, or that if they weren't killed, that they weren't given a trial. It's a wild assumption to assume that every shooting is a killing. So that was your premise. Invalidates what follows.

I can see this as art. Not as information.

This is a fanboy post. They aren't interested in facts or actually improving it. Everything you said is correct, and this is nothing but opinion dressed up with graphics. None of the terms mean anything, nor could they really, scientifically.

You mean opinion presented falsely as fact?

So, Fox News quality "data", presented by a fanboy. Got it.

Wow, someone did a thing so they're an expert on it throughout the entire business world, the legal system, language. All you do is keep repeating the same thing, which suggest you actually don't understand this, but are repeating talking points. Which would be pretty typical for an Elon stan.

So you're being intentionally obtuse? Repeating what you said above is in no way an answer to the fact that words have meaning, and per those meaning, he's not a founder.

Court documents don't change the definition of words, and courts don't change what actually happened. Courts have opinions, and you have yours, but words have meaning all on their own, quite independent of your opinion.

Of course the implication is that he personally did everything necessary for all of those outcomes. We are now seeing pretty conclusive evidence that his one skill has been hiring people far more competent than he is, because when he manages hands-on...