I get it leans toward socialist policy, but it's far from socialism. The free market and capitalism will never sacrifice for the betterment of the individual unless its a board member.

Corporations and the right wing would fight hard to avoid this. No one should get money for nothing, and especially not my money.

The counter to that, would be the free market has to compensate by increasing wages elsewhere in order to draw people to them. Win-win for people, loss loss for Corporations. And the government is run by corporations so we know something like this will not happen

Depends on the company, they could simply pay people the same, and likely get a higher quality of work, or they could pay people half, expect a low quality of work. I would wage that most corporations would not choose to cut the work time in half double the pay and take the losses from their profits. But I think it would make for much happier workers, and a far better product

Your right another easy solution is to simply higher twice the people and have half the shift length

That's true. And that's why someone needs to step in and help. A corporation is not going to do the best thing for those towns so it has to be government.

A large tax per "robot" that goes directly to the people would help alot, aka guaranteed basic income.

Yet people still complain those jobs are taken away by robots.

Absolutely and all those X$ worth of groceries in Y city should X number of work hours worth of groceries instead

Someone will port that old school Microsoft Surface app that would let you touch the pond with fish in it. And they will all freak out

Not if you talk to an Apple fan

Market cap and GDP both made up numbers to represent wealth that doesn't actually exist

Wonderful answer I thoroughly enjoyed reading that. You must have some sort of background in this stuff?

So going beyond the magnetic shielding concept, what about the idea that an active core and volcanoes are required to release the gases into the atmosphere in the first place?

Edit: scratch that I just seen your other comment answering that question already.

Losing the requirement for having an active core, I would assume, would drastically increase the number possible habitable worlds out there.

This is fascinating stuff to think about, even though it is basically completely irrelevant to day-to-day life.

That makes sense, since captured gas would basically be mostly be hydrogen, other vital gases would have to come from solids or gases trapped in the solids that created the planet, which will need an active core and volcanism to release.

Why does an active core make it possible to have an atmosphere?

Likely they will just kill them all.

Don't worry they will end up drunk and shooting eachother in the ass.

Give trank darts filled with vaccine to all the hunters

So what you're saying is everything that I've done up to now is crap

If that was true I'd be on your side, but you can monitor the network traffic out of those speakers and they are not constantly sending every sound

Exactly the same here

I'm a hardcore Tech person, I've been automating my house for 20+ years. We have Google devices all over the house and same as you we love them. I really hope they don't go away, and if they do I hope they give us access to the hardware to use it on our own. Would be great if you could just run it all off your own 15$ Raspberry Pi

The white glue still wet is what threw me off, and using white glue to solder electrical contacts

Same here, the one from my bank had the same phone number as mine

That's the stuff consumers can see, corporations had to do quite a lot of work on the back end to ensure a user can be deleted.

lighting is var inferior to usb c in every way, low power, lower speed, lower quality. USBc was developed by a conglomerate including apple.